document 24 RESUME I ED 024 541 RE 001 487 I By* Otto, Wayne I Overview of the Wisconsin Prototypic System of Reading Instruction in the Elementary School- Report rom | the Reading Project. I Wisconsin Univ., Madison. Research and Development Center for Cognitive Learning. Spons Agency* Office of Education (DHEW), Washington, D.C. Bureau of Research. Report No* WRDCCL*PP*5 I Bureau No* BR*5-0216 I Pub Date Aug 68 I' Contract* OEC*5* 10* 154 Note* 76p. | EDRS Price MF*$0.50HC*S3.90 _ Descriptors* Grouping (Instructional Purposes), Inservice Teacher Education, *Reading Materia s. * ea mg T Skills, * Reading Tests, *Sequential Reading Programs, *Student Records, Teaching Procedures, Iraditional I Schools I Identifiers* Wisconsin Prototypic System Of Reading Instruction _ I Although refinement and development are to continue, the Wisconsin Prototypic System is now at the point where it can serve as a basis for a reading program, particularly where there is to be strong emphasis on individually guided instruction. This report discusses the rationale and assumptions underlying the system and lists its component parts: an outline of reading skills, an individual skill development record that stays with the child from grades through 6, prototypic exercises for the assessment of reading skills (reductions of the exercises are included in the report), I the Wisconsin Expanding Inventory of Reading Development for use in group I assessment of reading skills, and a compendium of materials and procedures. Inservice preparation of staff, grouping for instruction, and implementation in the j multiunit school and the traditional school are also discussed. Further areas of I research are suggested. (WB) i t iflil Practical Paper No. 5 OVERVIEW OF THE WISCONSIN PROTOTYPIC SYSTEM OF READING INSTRUCTION IN THE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL By Wayne Otto Report from the Reading Project Wayne Otto, Principal Investigator Wisconsin Research and Development Center for Cognitive Learning The University of Wisconsin Madison, Wisconsin August, 1968 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION & WELFARE- OFFICE OF EDUCATION BEEN reproduced exactly as received from the: REPRESENT ommL «««" 3? The research reported herein was performed pursuant to a contract with the United States Office of Education, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, under the provisions of the Cooperative Research Program. Center No. C-03 / Contract OE 5-10-154 FOREWORD The goal of the Wisconsin R & D Center is to contribute to an under- standing of cognitive learning by children and youth and to improve related educational practices. Activities of projects in R & D Program 2, Processes and Programs of Instruction, are directed toward the development of instruc- tional programs based on research on teaching and learning and on the evaluation of concepts in subject fields. The reading project operates within Program 2. This Practical Paper provides an overview of the 2-year period of development of a prototypic instructional system in reading for the ele- mentary school as well as a description of the components, including an outline of objectives, assessment procedures, provision for individual records, and a compendium of materials related to each element in the outline. In the section on implementation of the system, the I & R Unit developed in R & D Program 3, Facilitative Environments, is discussed illustrating the interrelationship of Programs 2 and 3. Professor Otto emphasizes the fact that this prototypic instructional system is not an intact reading program but rather provides the basic ele- ments needed for the development of an individualized reading program in any school setting. Thomas A. Romberg Director, Programs 2 and 3 PREFACE The present paper is, as the title suggests, limited to the presentation of an overview of the Wisconsin Prototypic System of Reading Instruction: its background, the component parts of the system, and suggestions for implementation. The discussion is focused upon the system at its present stage of development, the assumption being that although development and refinement is to continue it is now at a point where it can be useful to school people as a basis for a reading program, particularly where there is to be emphasis upon individually guided instruction. The background, rationale, and assumptions underlying the system are discussed in the paper. When development of the prototypic system was begun, a basic decision was made to start with as little as possible and to add to the minimum base only as needs became apparent through feedback from teachers in the field and more formal research efforts. The Outline of Reading Skills — a hierar- chically arranged set of behavioral objectives in reading at the elementary (K— 6) level which is the foundation for the system — is a minimal statement. That is, much more explicit breakdowns of many of the skills (objectives) could be, and perhaps should be, made, but they will be made only if it becomes apparent that more specificity is needed in order to insure uninter- rupted development of reading skills. Perhaps, for example, it will become apparent that more explicit statements are needed at the kindergarten- readiness level to insure a reasonable prognosis of success; or, more specificity may be needed with certain skills to insure that the essential aspects be covered at the optimum time in the sequ en ce. Refinements of the Outline can be made as problems are identified in the field tryouts and alternate approaches are then tested in controlled, short-term experiments. Group assessment exercises have been developed to supplement the individual exercises that were prepared for the initial field tryout. It was apparent early last year that group exercises were needed to make the individual skill assessment scheme workable. The group exercises were developed from the field-tested individual exercises, which had been revised in view of feedback from teachers. Both sets of exercises will, if necessary, be revised as additional data become available, and realistic criteria for demonstration of mastery of specific skills will become apparent as data from large numbers of children are gathered. Two additional kinds of assessment instruments appear to be needed and await future development: (1) Diagnostic tests would probably be useful, at least for certain skills, to go beyond the behavior sampling for the assessment of current skill status provided by the existing exercises. That is, given a deficiency in a specific skill, it would be desirable to have a means for probing to discover the reasons for the deficiency, for the latter knowledge would permit the most straightforward prescription of corrective instruction. Here again, diagnostic tests can be developed as problems are identified in the field. (2) General achievement tests built upon the foundation of behavioral objectives listed for the system are needed to permit periodic testing to assess developmental growth in reading . A compendium of materials and procedures appropriate for use in teaching specific skills has been developed. New materials have not been developed for the system; instead, the attempt has been to identify existing materials and ideas and to key them to the Outline. The suggestion is that teachers use the compendium as a basic source and that they add items that they know or find to be particularly useful. Again, the attempt is to provide a nucleus or base as a beginning point and to identify areas in need of further development in view of experiences in the field. In some instances the development may come simply from a more exhaustive search of existing materials, but in others it may be necessary to develop new teaching materials . It would appear that the latter action may be necessary to make materials available for helping pupils to conceptualize and state the main idea in reading, for existing materials are quite limited in scope. The essential point is that we are attempting to make use of the profusion of existing materials and that we shall undertake the devel- opment of materials only when a gap in the r existing coverage is demonstrated. One of the major functions of the system is to provide a framework for individually guided instruction in reading. Some suggestions for implementation of the system and, concurrently, for the provision of individually guided instruc- tion are made in the present paper. A number of important questions remain to be answered. For example: Are there optimum sizes for the instructional groups when certain skills in certain areas are being taught? How might teacher time be most effectively distributed over individual, small group, and large group instruction? What can be done to insure active support of operation of the system? Here again particularly troublesome problem areas can be identified in the field and alternate solutions can be tried out and evaluated in terms of pupil progress in reading skill development. Finally, the prototypic system of reading instruction provides a framework for important research in the area of "learning for mastery" as discussed by Carroll^ and Bloom. ^ Very briefly, Carroll has suggested that although students may be normally distributed as to aptitude, given the kind and quality of instruc- tion and the amount of time for learning appropriate to the characteristics and needs of each student, the majority of students may be expected to achieve mastery of the subject and relationship between aptitude and achievement should approach zero. The present writer is in essential agreement with this point. Now it is suggested that the details of "kind" of instruction are spelled out— at least tentatively — for elementary reading by the compbnents , considered col- lectively, of the prototypic system; thus, the basis for the consideration of kind, quality, and pacing of instruction is provided. Some suggestions have already been made regarding the quality of instruction in reading; e.g. , flexible grouping according to individual skill assessment, dual grouping for instruction depending upon the areas involved. Research designed to find a workable bal- ance among the kind, quality, and pacing of instruction required for mastery in reading promises to be worthwhile. Such research can proceed within the frame- work provided by the prototypic system. ^Carroll, John. A model for school learning. Teachers College Record , 1963, 64, 222—228. ^Bloom, Benjamin S. Learning for mastery. In B. S. Bloom, J. T. Hastings, and G . F . Madaus , Formative and summative evaluation of stu dent learning . New York: McGraw-Hill, in press . ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Wisconsin Prototypic System of Reading Instruction represents, at its present state of development, almost two years of active support and creative effort from many people# To attempt to acknowledge this support and effort, which was forthcoming from diverse sources and from individuals with a wide array of affiliations, responsibilities, and competencies, is to undertake a formidable task. The people named here are those who had specific roles in various developmental activities; many other people were involved in a variety of ways . The initial Prototypic Guide to Reading Skill Development in the. Elementary Schools and the related Model Exercises and Observations were developed with the cooperative efforts of Camille Houston of the Reading Project staff, Ruth Saeman, reading consultant with the Madison Public Schools, and Patricia Wojtal and Betty McMahan, Unit leaders at Huegel School, Madison Public Schools . Mary Lou Ellison of the Reading Project staff had the difficult job of coordinating the 1967-68 field tryout— along with many other tasks— in five schools . She carried on and somehow managed to keep smiling as the faltering first steps toward implementation were taken. Personnel from five schools located in four districts participated in the 1967-68 field tryout. Many people contributed, but only a few can be named. William Amundson and Patricia Woolpert made it possible for the field tryout to be conducted in the Evansville Public Schools, which was the only non-Unitized setting for the tryout. In Madison, the tryout was conducted in Huegel School— Patricia Wojtal, Betty McMahan, and Maurine Miller were the Unit leaders involved— and in Franklin School— Joyce Peterson, Lera Gates, and Marguerite Gilbert were the Unit leaders . Ruth Saeman of the Madison central office reading staff contributed much, in terms of both professional and personal involvement, to the implementation of the field tryout and to the refinement of the system. Thomas Delamater, Norma Smith, Esther Olson, Helen Johns, and Connie Glowacki were the Unit leaders in Wilson School, Janesville Public Schools; and Norman. Graper, principal, offered continuing support. Mildred Yahnke, Janesville reading consultant, contributed freely from her apparently inexhaustible store of ideas and enthusiasm. In Racine, Winslow School— Mary Jane Clausen and Audrey James, Unit leaders— was designated for the tryout in an inner-city school. The support of Dawn Klofton, Winslow principal, and Mildred Brady, Racine reading consul- tant, is appreciate'd . Feedback and input from the field tryout has taken many forms and it has come from many sources and through many channels. We learned a great deal. Two day-long seminars were held at the R & D Center to permit people involved in the field tryout to share perceptions and ideas and to look toward future development. The seminars were a success because busy people who took two full days from their schedules participated freely and constructively. The following people participated: Mary Lou Ellison, Camille Houston, Karl Koenke, and Diana Weintraub from the Reading Project staff; Ruth Saeman, Joyce Peterson, Patricia Wojtal, and Betty McMahan of the Madison Public Schools; Thomas Delamater and Mildred Yahnke of the Janesville Public Schools; Mary Jane Clausen and Audrey Janes of the Racine Public Schools; Patricia Woolpert and Joyce Glass of the Evansville Public Schools; and George Glasrud of the Wisconsin State Department of Public Instruction. Members of the Reading Project staff have worked together on all aspects of the system, but individuals have taken primary responsibility for certain of the component parts. Diana Wbintraub joined the staff early in 1968 and began to work on the Wisconsin Expanding Inventory of Reading Development. Without her creative talent— exemplified by the splendid acronym for which she is respon- sible — and untiring efforts, WEIRD would not be what it is today. Mary Lou Ellison and Camille Houston did the analyses and compiled the suggestions that are summarized in the Compendium of Materials and Procedures . Mary Lou and Diana coordinated the revisions of the Outline of Reading Skills, the Individual Reading Skill Development Record, and the Prototypic Exercises for the Assess- ment of Reading Skills. Carol Niblett did the art work. The person who did the typing always seems to be mentioned last, not, I think, because the contribution is felt to be least significant but because the contribution is so constant and so obvious that it is taken for granted. Anyway, the latter is so in the present instance. Susy Schultz: you type real good. CONTENTS I. Background of the Prototypic System Introduction Rationale Assumptions II. Overview of Component Parts of the Prototypic System The Outline of Reading Skills Individual Reading Skill Development Record Prototypic Exercises for the Assessment of Reading Skills Wisconsin Expanding Inventory of Reading Development ^ Compendium of Materials and Procedures Summary III. Implementation of the Prototypic System General Assumptions Inservice Preparation of Staff Grouping for Instruction Implementation in the Multiunit School Implementation in the Traditional School IV. Prototypic Exercises for the Assessment of Reading Skills LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Check Sheet for Self-Directed, Interpretive, and Creative Reading 2 Organization Chart of a Multiunit School of 600 Students Page 1 1 1 2 4 4 9 10 11 12 1 ° 13 13 15 16 19 21 22 18 19 ix I BACKGROUND OF THE PROTOTYPIC SYSTEM INTRODUCTION The general purpose of this paper is to pre- sent an overview of -a prototypic system of reading instruction that is being developed within the context of the Wisconsin Research and Development Center for Cognitive Learning. The presentation is directed mainly to the practitioner. Research related to the system and its development is discussed in the preface. Development of the program was begun early in 1967, and by the summer of 1967 an outline of reading skills, a series of correlated assess- ment exercises-*- and individual pupil record folders had been produced and were ready for tryout in the field. During the 1967-68 school year thG Gristing portions of the system were used in iour Multiunit schools ^ and one tradi- tional school* As a result of the field tryout (1) the placement of a number of skills was changed in the scope and sequence outline, reflecting observations that certain skills were placed too high or too low in the skill develop- ment hierarchy and that certain skills needed to be restated at subsequent levels of development; (2) many of the individual assessment exercises were redesigned to make them more appropriate 1 SeeW. Otto, R. Saeman, C. Houston, B. McMahan, and P. Wojtal, Prototypic guide to reading skill development in the elementary school. Working Paper from t he Wisconsin R & D Center for Cognitive Learning , University ofWisconsin, 1967, No. 7. 2 See H. J. Klausmeier , D. M-. Cook, G. E. Tagatz, and J. L. Wardrop, Project MODELS: A facilitative environment for increasing effi- ciency of pupil learning and for conducting educational research and development. Workj ing Paper from the Wisconsin R & D Center for Cognitive Learning , University ofWisconsin, 1967, No. 5. for use with children and/or to make the focus upon a specific skill more clear; and (3) the individual pupil record folder was redesigned to make it both more attractive and more useful as a communication/diagnostic tool. In addi- tion, as the Reading Project staff worked closely with the teachers , Unit leaders and consultants in the several schools, many ways in which the prototypic system could be usefully augmented and further refined were identified, and some of the critical problems in implementing the system were recognized . Knowledge gained from the field tryout, then, has been the basis for revision of previously existing materials and the addition of certain materials to the prototypic system. This knowl- edge has also made it possible to make a num— ber of suggestions, based upon experience in the field and the stated needs of school person- nel, to expedite the implementation of the sys- tem. In this paper the existing component parts of the system are introduced and des- cribed, and implementation of the system— in Multiunit and traditional schools — is discussed. The system continues to undergo develop- ment: This paper is, in a sense, a progress report as of Summer 1968. We shall continue to refine the prototype we began with more than a year ago and we hope that others will join us. Meanwhile, the system is at a stage of develop- ment where it can be useful in the field, both as a guide to individually guided instruction and as the basis for an elementary school read- ing program. RATIONALE The foundation for the prototypic system of reading instruction is the Outline of Reading Skills (see p.4). The Outline is a scope and sequence statement of reading skills for kinder- garten through Grade 6. The arrangement of skills is, in a sense, arbitrary: Other scope and sequence outlines that are defensible have 1 been and will continue to be developed; yet, the present arrangement of skills represents a consensus among teachers , Unit leaders, and reading consultants who originally constructed the Outline, and it has been shown to be viable in the field. The point here is that the Outline of Reading Skills represents a defensible— if not the ultimate — scope and sequence state- ment that serves as a description of hierarchi- cally arranged reading skills for the elementary grades. The Outline can and should be changed when changes are felt to be necessary for philo- sophical, theoretical, or pragmatic reasons . It is prototypic, not dogmatic. In another sense the Outline of Reading Skills comprises a set of objectives, behaviorally stated , for the reading program in kindergarten through Grade 6. The attempt has been to strike a balance between specificity and generality in stating objectives in order to represent the es- sentials with at least minimal adequacy without becoming bogged down in details and technicali- ties . In essence, the entire prototypic system described here is designed to help teachers expedite the movement of children through the sequence of objectives by providing a means whereby they can focus upon the skill develop- ment of individuals. Fortunately, information about individuals' skill development can be the basis for intelligent grouping as well as for strictly instruction. The point here is that whether instruction is to proceed with individu- als or with groups is left to the teachers in- volved, it is not decreed by the system. In practice, a child is likely to receive some indi- vidual and some group instruction, with the size of an individual's instructional unit at any given time dictated by (a) his idiosyncratic skill development status, (b) the commonality of his status with that of other pupils , and (c) the nature of the instruction being offered. The component parts of the entire system are described in detail in the next section of this paper, but each is briefly introduced here to show the interrelationships among the several part s . To assess pupils' attainment of specific skills (objectives) , a set of exercises designed for use with individuals — Prototypic Exercises for the Assessment of Reading Skills — provides a means for sampling pupil behaviors associated with each of the skills in selected areas of the Outline of Reading Skills . The Prototypic Exer- cises for the Assessment of Reading Skills are reproduced, reduced in size, in the final por- tion of this paper. A parallel set of exercises for group administration — the Wisconsin Expand- ing Inventory of Reading Development has also been devised. The group exercises provide a means for initial assessment and periodic check- ing of skill development with the time-saving advantages of group administration. Taken together, the group and individual exercises provide the basis for the assessment and con- tinual updating of the Individual Reading Skill Development Record. The Individual Reading Skill Development Record, a folder that serves as a permanent record of skill development and as a repository for relevant supplementary information for indi- vidual pupils, is an integral part of the system. The Outline of Reading Skills is reproduced on the Record and space is provided for the teacher to indicate when the pupil reaches an acceptable level of proficiency with each skill. Thus, when it is kept current, the Record provides an up-to-date individual profile of reading skill development from kindergarten through sixth grade . Finally, a correlated list of materials and procedures has been compiled for use with the Wisconsin Prototypic System of Reading Instruc- tion. Again, the basis is the Outline of Read- ing Skills: Specific suggestions are keyed to the objectives in the outline. The intent is not to provide a comprehensive listing, but to iden- tify a core of materials and procedures found to be useful in the field. In application, the ex- pectation is that teachers will supplement the basic list with materials that are available and procedures that are particularly useful to them. The materials and procedures list completes the instructional cycle inherent in the prototypic system: a behavioral objective is stated; a means is provided for sampling the behavior involved with that objective, yielding a basis for assessing skill attainment; and, if an ac- ceptable level of mastery has not been reached, materials and procedures appropriate for teach- ing /learning the skill are suggested. ASSUMPTIONS Several assumptions have shaped the devel- opment of the prototypic system. The Outline of Reading Skills was constructed to accommodate an eclectic approach to the de- velopment of word recognition skills . The skills included in the word recognition portion of the Outline have been found to be generally accept- able to teachers who employ a variety of in- structional approaches. It seems obvious, however, that no single outline could accom- modate all of the approaches , with their wide variations in emphases and the hierarchical arrangement of skills , being advocated at the present time . Aside from the specific area of word recog- nition, the general assumption is that the pro- totypic system described here will be adapted 2 in view of existing local conditions. The pro- totypic system can be the foundation upon which a reading program that is appropriate for and sensitive to the needs and desires of a local school or school district is built. The most valuable contribution of the prototypic system in some situation may be its provision of a starting point for discussion of the objec- tives of a desirable reading program and the means for reaching the objectives. The essen- tial point here is that change, in the form of refinement in view of additional knowledge and adaptation to meet local needs , is not only ex- pected but encouraged. While most of the early field tryout has been conducted in Multiunit schools, every attempt has been made to keep the prototypic system workable in traditionally organized schools. There is little question that the Multiunit organi- zation facilitates the implementation of the system, just as it facilitates the implementation of many other types of innovations; nevertheless , there are no inherent conditions to block the implementation of the system in other organiza- tional set-ups. (Suggestions for implementation in Multiunit and traditional schools are given in another section of this paper.) The system should be equally workable, too, in both graded and ungraded schools, for the hierarchy of skill development is not necessarily tied to grade level designations. There is no assumption that any particular array of instructional materials will be used in schools where the prototypic system is in oper- ation. As already mentioned, the list of cor- related materials and procedures is intended merely to provide a base from which a more comprehensive list can be developed. The ex- pectation is that in operation the system will be useful in making a multitext/multimaterial approach to reading instruction truly workable. That is , given a consensual statement of se- quentially arranged behavioral objectives, the task of insuring continuity of instruction from a variety of materials is made more reasonable than it might be when each teacher must attempt to coordinate skill development sequences that are frequently out of phase in different materials. A final and extremely important assumption is that the school personnel who tackle the task of individualizing instruction through the use of the prototypic system will be willing to accept the hard work involved. The prototypic system is not an instant reading program, nor is it a neat little bundle of self-administering lessons. It provides a foundation for a reading program and it is a basis for individually guided instruction; but the details must be provided in the local setting and the teaching is the re- sponsibility of the teachers in the field. We feel that good teachers would, want it no other way. 3 II OVERVIEW OF COMPONENT PARTS OF THE PROTOTYPIC SYSTEM THE OUTLINE OF READING SKILLS As a statement of the objectives of reading instruction in kindergarten through Grade 6 , the Outline of Reading Skills is the foundation of the prototypic system. The six areas covered in the Outline— I. Word Recognition, II. Com- prehension, III. Study Skills, IV. Self- Difected Reading, V. Interpretive Reading , and VI. Creative Reading — include the objec- tives commonly considered in a reasonably broadly conceived definition of reading in the elementary school. Each of the six areas is subdivided into five levels, with Levels A, B, C , and D being roughly equivalent to Kindergar- ten, Grades 1, 2, and 3 and Level E spanning Grades 4, 5, and 6. The question of whether or not to designate levels has been troublesome . One might argue that to designate levels is to imply that certain skills should be taught at certain grade levels and that this flies in the face of the basic as- sumptions underlying individualized instruction. On the other hand, the levels provide at least a rough indication of normative pacing by grade. The decision was to indicate distinct levels for kindergarten through Grade 3, the period during which the sequential development of skills re- ceives much attention, and to indicate a single level for Grades 4-6, the period during which the emphasis is placed upon the refinement of skills. Teachers in graded situations may find the leveling to be of some use; teachers in non- graded schools are invited to ignore the levels. Both groups are cautioned to be concerned about each individual's skill development across the six areas covered in the outline. And, to state the obvious, the stage of an individual's skill development, not his year in school, dictates the appropriate level of his instruction. Origins The Outline of Reading Skills is based sub- stantially upon the Madison Public Schools' scope and sequence statement. It does not differ fundamentally from hundreds of other scope and sequence statements and it was chosen for that reason: We did not feel it was necessary to rediscover the reading skills. The scope, sequential arrangement , and word- ing of the Outline were examined in the 1967- 68 field tryout in five schools, and revisions were made in view of the feedback from the field. The present Outline, then, is a con- sensually acceptable statement by reading teachers who had an opportunity to work with the preliminary Outline for an entire school year. The Outline The Outline is given in the pages that im- mediately follow. Two points should be noted: First, specific objectives are not listed at Level E for Word Recognition. The assumption is that the essential skills will have been introduced early and that the attention at the intermediate level should be devoted to the refinement of existing skills. Second, some of the objectives listed under Study Skills might also have been listed under Comprehension and vice, vers a.. Arbitrary placement for the purpose of recording should not imply a lack of relationship among the skills. I. WORD RECOGNITION Level A 1. Listens for rhyming elements a. Words b. Phrases and verses 2. Notices likenesses and differences a . Pictures b. Letters and numbers c. Words and phrases 3. Distinguishes sizes 4. Distinguishes colors 5. Distinguishes shapes of objects 6. Listens for initial consonant sounds 4 Level B 1. Has sight word vocabulary of 50 to 100 words 2. Follows left-to-right sequence 3. Has phonic analysis skills a. Consonant sounds 1. Beginning 2. Ending b. Consonant blends c. Rhyming elements d. Short vowels e. Simple consonant digraphs 4. Has structural analysis skills a. Compound words b . Contractions c. Base words and known endings d. Simple plural forms e. Simple possessive forms Level C 1. Has sight word vocabulary of 100 to 170 words 2. Has phonic skills a. Consonants and their variant sounds b. Consonant blends c. Vowel sounds 1 . Long 2. Vowel plus_r 3 . a. plus _L 4. a_ plus w 5. Diphthongs oi, oy., ou, ow, ew 6. Long and short oo_ d. Vowel rules 1 . Short vowel generalization 2. Silent £ rule 3. Two vowels together 4. Final vowel e. Knows the common consonant digraphs 3. Has structural skills a. Base words with prefixes and suffixes b. More difficult plural forms 4. Distinguishes among homonyms.- syno- nym s , and anto nym s a. Homonyms b. Synonyms and antonyms 5. Has independent and varied word attack skills 6. Chooses appropriate meaning of multiple meaning words Level D 1. Has sight word vocabulary of 170 to 240 words 2. Has phonic analysis skills a. Three-letter consonant blends b. Simple principles of silent letters 3. Has structural skills a . Syllabication b. Accent c. Schwa d. Possessive forms Level E 1. Chooses appropriate meaning of multiple meaning words . 2. Knows syllabication patterns a. Syllabication patterns b. Single vowel sound per syllable II . CO MPREHENSION Level A 1. Develops listening skills a. Has attention and concentration span suitable for his age b. Is able to remember details c. Can relate details to each other in reconstructing story read to him d. Can follow two oral directions 2. Increases vocabulary through listening 3. Is able to recall stories in sequential order 4. Anticipates outcome of stories 5. Interprets pictures critically 6. Can identify main characters in a story Level B 1. Uses picture and context clues 2. Is able to gain meaning from a. Words b. Sentences c. Whole selections 3. Uses punctuation as a guide to meaning Level C 1. Is able to gain meaning from a. Words b. Phrases c. Paragraphs 2. Reads in meaningful phrases Level D 1 . Reads for facts 2. Reads for sequence of events Level E 1. Adjusts reading rate to a. Type of material 1 . Factual 2. Fiction b. Level of difficulty c. Purpose 1 . Identification 2. Reading for general information 3. Reading for specific information d. Familiarity with the subject • 2. Gains additional skill in use of punctua- tion as a guide to meaning (semicolon, colon, dash, and added uses of the comma) 3. Selects main idea of paragraphs 4. Reads for sequence of events 5. Is able to gain meaning from a. Words 5 Level E (continued) b. Sentences c. Paragraphs III . STUDY SKILLS Level A 1. Follows simple directions 2. Demonstrates elementary work habits a. Shows independence in work b. Accepts responsibility for comple- tion and quality of work 3. Shows development of motor coordination (eye and hand) 4. Uses picture clues to find answers to questions Level B 1. Follows directions a. Follows directions when working in a group b. Follows directions when working independently c. Follows written directions 2. Has adequate work habits 3. Recognizes organization of ideas in sequential order 4. Summaries material 5. Begins to make judgments and draws conclusions 6. Uses table of contents Level C 1. Uses picture dictionaries to find new words 2. Groups words by initial letters 3. Explores library as research center 4. Shows increasing independence in work a. Reads and follows directions by himself b. Uses table of contents without being reminded to do so c. Uses dictionary and glossary inde- pendently when appropriate 5 . Begins to read maps Level D 1 . Begins to use index of books 2. Reads simple maps and graphs a. Maps b. Graphs 1 . Picture graphs 2. Bar graphs 3. Realizes printed statements may be either fact or opinion 4. Has beginning outlining skills 5. Follows directions 6. Has adequate work habits Level E 1. Increases and broadens dictionary skills a. Alphabetizes words b. Uses guide words as aid in finding words c. Uses diacritical markings for pro- nunciation aids 2. Utilizes encyclopedia a. Uses guide letters to find informa- tion on a given subject b. Uses alphabetical arrangement to locate information c. Understands the purpose of topical headings d. Understands the index e. Uses encyclopedia with greater facility to find information f. Understands and uses 1. Topical headings 2. Cross references 3. Bibliographies g. Uses the index volume efficiently 3. Uses maps, charts, and graphs a. Gains skill in reading and inter- preting political maps b . Begins to read and interpret simple graphs c. Reads and interprets several kinds of maps d. Reads and uses captions, keys, and legends of maps e. Selects appropriate maps to deter- mine 1 . Direction 2. Distance 3. Land formation 41 Climates 5. Time zones 6. Populations f. Reads and interprets additional kinds of graphs g. Answers questions requiring the interpretation of maps, graphs, and tables h. Gains skill in using many potential types of sources to solve a problem 4. Uses IMC or library effectively a. Understands fiction books are alphabetized by author b. Begins to use card catalogue to find information c. Understands and uses author, title, and subject cards d. Locates books on shelves e. Uses cross reference cards f. Uses other reference materials 1. Atlases 2. World Almanac 3. Pamphlet file 4. Magazines and subject index to children's magazines g. Locates and uses audio-visual materials 1. Card catalogue 2. Equipment 5. Recognizes and uses with facility the various parts of texts and supplementary book and materials 6. Organizes information a. Gains skill in notetaking 1 . Begins to take notes in own words 2. Learns to take notes selectively 3. Arranges ideas in sequence 4. Selects main ideas 5. Selects supporting details 6. Keeps notes brief 7. Shows ability to work from own notes 8. Identifies source of materials by use of a. Bibliography b. Footnotes b. Understands and uses^outlining in work 1. Uses correct form of outline 2. Can find main idea 3. Makes sample outline 4. Outlines topics in more detail 5. Uses own outline for oral and written reports 6. Uses outline to organize think- ing in appropriate areas c. Summarizes material 1 . Writes summary of a story in three or four sentences 2. States important points ex- pressed in a discussion 7. Evaluates information a. Realizes printed statements may be either fact or opinion b. Checks statements with those in other sources to evaluate validity c. Evaluates relevancy of materials to topic d. Compares various viewpoints on the same topic e. Evaluates information in terms of his own experience f. Identifies propaganda 8. Follows directions IV. SELF- DIRECTED READING Level A 1. Cares for books properly 2. Is aware of sequential order of books 3. Begins to show initiative in selecting picture books Level B 1 . Begins to apply independent word study skills 2. Is able to find answers to questions inde- pendently. 3. Begins to do recreational reading 4. Begins to select suitable reading materials independently Level C 1 . Broadens skills listed at Levels A and B 2. Develops increasing fluency ■ Level D 1. Develops varied purposes for selecting material 2. Begins to do independent research assignments 3. Is able to locate sources of information 4. Applies reading skills to subject matter areas Level E 1. Conducts research independently a. Applies work study skills to inde- pendent work b. Uses bibliography as guide to materials c. Makes own bibliography in research work d. Uses multiple sources to find infor- mation e. Broadens application of reading skills f. Understands the function of foot- notes 2. Reads independently a. Enjoys reading and reads widely b. Selects reading materials 1. Appropriate for his reading level 2. Of a variety of kinds (maga- zines, newspapers, etc.) 3. That hold his interest c. Keeps a brief record of his library book reading d. Enjoys sharing his reading experi- ences with others e. Seems to use his independent read- ing to initiate activities (e.g., in- dependent projects, intellectual or manipulative; creative activities; hobbies) 3. Appreciates literature a. Enriches vocabulary through wide reading b. Cherishes and rereads favorite books and stories c. Begins to evaluate a selection of literature and analyze why it did or did not appeal to him d. Shows interest in building a per- sonal library e. Becomes more discriminating in his reading 7 Level E (continued) f. Uses reading increasingly as a leisure time activity V. INTERPRETIVE READING Level A 1 . Reacts to pictures and relates to own experiences 2. Shows interest in stories read 3. Begins to react to mood of poems and stories Level B 1 . Sees humor in situations 2. Reads with expression 3. Has empathy with characters Level C 1 . Recognizes implied ideas 2. Identifies character traits 3. Begins to make judgments 4. Begins to draw conclusions Level D 1 . Recognizes reactions and motives of characters 2. Has ability to relate to stories set in background different from his own 3. Makes simple inferences about charac- ters and story outcomes Level E 1. Reaches conclusions on the basis of stated facts 2. Relates isolated incidents to the central idea of a story 3 . Understands character roles 4. Recognizes and ant ' - zes more subtle emotional reactions and motives of characters 5. Handles implied ideas 6. Recognizes story problem or plot struc- ture 7. Gains skill in interpreting and appreci- ating types of language (figurative, idi- omatic, picturesque, dialectal) 8. Senses subtle humor and pathos 9. Reacts to writer as well as writing a. Begins to identify elements of style b. Begins to identify his purpose in writing c. Begins to evaluate and react to ideas in light of the author's purpose 10. Forms and reacts to sensory images 11. Perceives influence of different elements within selection a. Notes impact of time and place b. Follows sequence of events c. Understands cause-effect relation- ship 12. Identifies and reacts to tone and mood 13. Selectively assimilates ideas a. Uses ideas gained from reading to solve a problem in other areas b. Integrates ideas read with previous experiences c. Modifies behavior and thinking as a result of reading 14. Gains increased skill in critical reading a. Weighs evidence b. Combines materials from various sources in making decisions and solving problems c. Understands the importance of checking facts and conclusions frequently d. Develops understanding that critical thinking is necessary in a democracy VI. CREATIVE READING Level A 1 . Engages in creative dramatic play based on stories read by teacher 2. Reflects mood in use of voice Level B 1 . Has ability to '-.ijoy rhythm in words 2. Has ability to see and hear rhyming words 3. Can interpret ideas and stories through discussions, dramatizations, drawing, etc. 4. Has ability to do cooperative planning 5. Is able to share ideas a. Shares with individuals b. Shares with groups 6. Participates in development of experi- ence charts 7. Tells original stories Level C 1 . Shows initiative in large group activities 2. Uses voice intonation creatively 3. Writes original stories Level D 1 . Shares in creative dramatics a. Acts out stories read b. Creates own plays 2. Identifies with people and situations encountered in stories Level E 1. Participates in choral speaking 2. Memorizes poems 3. Tells stories to the group 4. Plans dramatizations of stories and poems 5. Reads selections of his choice and to the group 6. Shares books with others 7. Composes original stories and poems 8 8 . Reads orally to entertain 9. Pantomimes 10. In artistic media expresses ideas gained from reading INDIVIDUAL READING SKILL DEVELOPMENT RECORD The Individual Reading Skill Development Record makes the system operational. The Record is a- file folder on which the entire Out- line of Reading Skills is printed. Space is provided for the teacher to check off each skill as it is attained. A record is begun for each child as he enters kindergarten and it is kept current through Grade 6. Functions of the Record The Record can serve a number of functions both in the classroom and in the total school building /district. The most prominent of the functions observed in the field tryout follow. (1) The simple fact of the Record's existence and its key role in the implementation of system keeps a broadly conceived overview of the objectives in reading constantly before the teacher. In the press of day-to-day operations it becomes extremely easy to focus upon bits and pieces and to lose the broad conception. The Record serves as a constant reminder. Furthermore, the Record can be the basis for inservice discussions of the scope and sequence of reading skills. (2) Within the classroom, the pupils' Records, if they are kept current, can serve as a basis for intraclass grouping for reading instruction. The function, then, is to facilitate individually guided instruction. In- struction need not necessarily be one-to-one to be individualized: Whenever instruction is planned in response to a specific need of an individual it is individualized. Inspection of the Records for common and/or unique pupil profiles can lead directly to the identification of specific skill development needs of indi- viduals and groups , and instruction can be planned in terms of specific skills. (3) The Record can help to expedite communication about pupils among teachers within a grade or Unit. The need for such communication is obvious in the Multiunit school, and it is equally great when any degree of interclass grouping for instruction in reading is done. (4) The Record can also help to insure the flow of communication within both the school build- ing and the school district. In a graded situa- tion, the Record provides a base for the new teacher to begin with in the fall; the same in- formation is available when a child moves from one Unit to another in a Unitized school. If the system is functioning district-wide, then pupils who change schools within the district will have a record of reading skill development to accompany them and their assimilation into a new group will be greatly expedited, (5) The Record can also be useful as a guide to report- ing in parent-teacher conferences. It provides a concrete basis for discussing a pupil's over- all skill development in reading. (6) Finally, because the Record is a file folder it can serve literally as a receptacle for supplementary in- formation, such as group test profiles, anec- dotal comments , etc. Keeping the Record Two collections of assessment exercises have been developed as a part of the prototypic system: the Prototypic Exercises for the Assess- ment of Reading Skills, designed for individual administration, and the Wisconsin Expanding Inventory of Reading Development, which is designed for group administration. Both sets of exercises are described in detail in the pages that follow. The point here is that the two sets of exercises are the basic tools pro- vided within the prototypic system to (a) assist teachers in making the necessary judgments to keep the Individual Reading Skill Development Records current , and (b) insure a reasonable degree of consensus among teachers as they make their judgments. The need for consensus in making the re- quired judgments is basic if the Record is to serve an optimal function as a vehicle for com- munication. If teachers approach the task of making judgments about skill attainment with different sets of criteria and/or different con- ceptions of acceptable mastery levels , then the usefulness of the Record is limited to the self- contained classroom. The individual and group exercises , evoking behavior samples , serve the function of bringing the skill into focus . That a particular group of teachers accept the exercises just as they are described is, of course, less important than that they arrive at some mutually acceptable behavior descriptions. The suggested exercises can be adopted as they are or modified in whatever ways seem sensible. Even with a consensually acceptable set of exercises, the question of precisely what con- stitutes mastery of a particular skill is extremely troublesome. A teacher may encounter children who succeed one day and fail the next with the same task; he may feel that although a child succeeds or fails with a specific exercise, this does not represent his real skill development status; or he may see that although a child performs a directed task satisfactorily , he can- not or does not apply the same skills independ- ently. Because all of these situations exist, it is imperative that observations based upon 9 the exercises be tempered with good judgment and, in some cases, supplemented with informal observations. The teacher confronted with the necessity of indicating mastery of a skill on an individual's Record may find it disconcerting at first to operate without explicit norms; but ex- perience has shown that the judgments can be made with reasonable confidence, particularly when guidelines have been arrived at through faculty discussion. Teachers who participated in the field tryout devised some means for handling certain details of keeping. the Record. The general feeling was that'it would be useful to record the date on which a skill was judged to be at a sufficiently high level of development rather than Limply to check it off. With that bit of information, teachers working subsequently with a record would know the grade/chronological age con- text in which the judgment was originally made. This is important because many skills must be developed to higher levels of sophistication after initial "mastery." Some teachers recorded the dates in different colors, which were keyed to pupils' grade placement. That is, second graders' entries were made in, say, red; third graders' in blue; etc. The expectation was that over the seven-year span covered by the Record the color keying would help to make individuals' emerging patterns of skill development clear. A few teachers attempted to set a minimum num- ber of correct responses for each individual skill assessment exercise, but in general this was not felt to be particularly useful or desir- able. Projecting into the future, as performance data from large numbers of pupils become avail- able for the group assessment exercises, it will be possible to derive normative guidelines. Such guidelines should have some value in pro- viding a starting point for making judgments about individuals , but they will not replace considered judgments based upon the exercises and/or systematic observations. A question that has frequently been asked is: How much time will it take to keep the Record current? Unfortunately, there is no general answer. For some individuals keeping the Record will take much time , and for others it will take relatively little time . There is no question that the total time involved for an entire class will be substantial. But to keep things in perspective, the teacher viewing the Record for the first time must remember that the skills listed cover a seven year span of devel- opment . PROTOTYPIC EXERCISES FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF READING SKILLS The Prototypic Exercises for the Assessment of Reading Skills , which are designed for indi- vidual administration, are reproduced in reduced size in the final portion of this paper. Full- size Exercises suitable for use with children are packaged in an envelope with the recom- mendation that the Exercises be inserted into transparent plastic folders and bound in a large ring binder. Exercises have been prepared for each of the objectives (skills) included in the Outline of Reading Skills in Areas I, Word Rec- ognition, II, Comprehension, and III, Study Skills; for reasons discussed later, there are no exercises for Areas IV, Self-Directed Read- ing, V, Interpretive Reading, and VI, Creative Reading. Each exercise calls for a sampling of the type of behavior associated with a specific skill from the Outline. As already pointed out, this behavior sampling serves to pin down the skill involved and to provide the teacher with a basis for making judgments about pupils' skill development status . Skill review cards , which include brief samplings from the several skills included at a given level, have been provided to aid the teacher in (a) establishing a pupil's base level of competence or (b) reviewing a pupil's skill status at a given point in the se- quence . In practice, the Exercises, in concert with the group Inventory, can be the source of basic input for the Individual Reading Skill Develop- ment Record. As the Record evolves, it dic- tates the particular exercises to be used at particular times . The skill levels (A, B, C, D, E) should not be tied slavishly to grade levels or years in school. Instead each teacher must be sensitive to each child's emerging skill mastery. A child might, for example, be oper- ating at different levels in the several skill areas. It is necessary to watch simultaneously for growth through skill levels and across skill areas . While kindergarten teachers may be able to focus on a rather narrow band of skills , teachers at subsequent levels must be prepared to deal with wider achievement r.anges, which may overlap two or more levels . To focus on a specific skill on the Record, the procedure is to find the appropriate exercise, which is identified by the Outline designation (e.g. , if the intent is to assess the skill given at I. A3b in the Outline the appropriate exercise is given at I. A3b in the Prototypic Exercises for the Assessment of Reading Skills) . The sampling of behavior evoked by the exercise can help to provide one basis for a judgment as to whether the skill requires further concentrated attention or only incidental developmental fol- lowup. Of course the final judgment should always be based upon all of the information available (e.g. observations in other contexts, relevant standardized test scores, etc.), and in some cases it will be necessary to seek 10 additional information. Each exercise is in- tended to be prototypic: that is, the basic model is provided with the expectation that additions, revisions, and adaptations will be made . As already noted there are no specific exer- cises for Areas IV, V, and VI of the Outline. Of course there are no exercises for Self- Directed Reading because to structure the task would be to preclude self-direction. Observa- tions of self-directed reading must be made opportunistically, and judgments as to skill attainment are preferably made in consultation with the school librarian or instructional mate- rials center director. Useful insights may also be gained from parent conferences . Prolonged observation and subjective judgments are nec- essary in the areas of Interpretive and Creative Reading. Spontaneous reactions from children are more indicative of underlying skill develop- ment in these areas than solicited behaviors. The Outline itself can serve as a guide to rele- vant observations and as a reminder of the many important skills that frequently tend to be ne- glected. To sum up, several points that have been explicitly or implictly made about the Prototypic Exercises are reviewed. (1) The exercises are intended to help teachers to focus upon specific skills as they make judgments about individuals' skill development. (2) The Exercises are pro- totypic: They may be adapted, supplemented, or replaced in view of the demands of a particu- lar situation. (3) Norms or expected minimum scores are not provided for the exercises. The suggestion is that an exercise serve as just one basis for skill assessment and that local teacher groups should develop their own criteria for judging skill mastery. (4) Time limits are not suggested for the administration of individual exercises. The focus is upon individual per- formance, so there should be no attempt to standardize administration procedures . (5) A final point, which has not yet been made, is that answer keys are provided only in instances where teachers in the field tryout felt they would be useful. WISCONSIN EXPANDING INVENTORY OF READING DEVELOPMENT The 19 67-68 field tryout demonstrated the fact that implementation of the system would be greatly expedited if a means for group assess- ment were made available to serve as a basis for the initial placement of pupils on the Indi- vidual Reading Skill Development Record. The need for such an instrument was particularly apparent at the upper elementary levels, where pupils' background of skill development is well along and individual skill assessment can be excessively time consuming unless a certain base level of skill mastery is either assumed or determined by other means. In response to this need, the Wisconsin Expanding Inventory of Reading Development was constructed. The Inventory is designed for group administration as a paper-and-pencil test, and it parallels the Prototypic Exercises in both content and scope. The Inventory is limited to the same skill areas as the Prototypic Exercises, i.e. Word Recognition, Comprehension, and Study Skills. Within each of the three skill areas, clusters of items are provided for the assessment of each of the sequentially arranged skills. The items in each cluster are patterned after the items in the individual exercise for the same skill. The intent, then, is to sample similar behaviors with both the individual and group assessment exercises so they can be used interchangeably as a basis for the judgments required by the Individual Reading Skill Development Record. The recommendation for practice is to administer appropriate portions of the Inventory early in the school year and to use the results obtained to make at least tentative judgments about indi- viduals' skill status for the purpose of up-dating or beginning the individual Records. Analyses of pupil profiles can then provide basic data for initial grouping and instructional planning . The individual assessment exercises can be used as needed to fill in gaps , to verify existing in- formation, and to check progress. Portions of the Inventory can be readministered or additional portions can be given when a teacher feels the information would be useful. The assessment sequence is discussed further in the implemen- tation section of this paper. The format of the Inventory is tied closely to the Outline of Reading Skills. That is, there are separate booklets for assessing the skills listed at each level in each of the three skill areas, e.g. Word Recognition, Level A; Word Recognition, Level B; etc. The complete Inven- tory comprises fourteen booklets, four for Word Recognition, five for Comprehension, and five for Study Skills. The intent is to make it pos- sible to administer only the booklet from each skill area that is generally appropriate to the skill development status of a pupil at a particu- lar point in time. In practice, the procedure may not be so straightforward with all pupils because some difficulty may be encountered in establishing a base level. That is, if a particu- lar booklet is too difficult or too easy for a pupil, it will be necessary to administer the booklet for the preceding or following level. Given experience with the Inventory and some basis for estimating base level — say, observation 11 of performance on an informal inventory or on the skill reviews included with the Prototypic Exercises — teachers should be able to keep such problems to a minimum. Too often the requirements of standardization and ease of scoring dictate the nature and con- tent of tests and thereby prescribe the informa- tion they yield. We decided early that stand- ardized administration and ease of scoring were secondary concerns in constructing the Inven- tory; the primary concern was to focus upon specific skills as explicitly as possible within the constraints imposed by group administra- tion. Therefore, there are no time limits; the teacher is permitted to supply unknown words where word recognition is not the skill being examined; some exercises are scored by scal- ing responses and some scoring must be tem- pered by teacher judgment. Detailed instruc- tions for administering and scoring the Inven- tory are given in the Teacher's manual. The essential point here is that the Inventory is not conceived as a "standardized" test; it is de- signed to serve a diagnostic function and the sampling of individual reading behaviors is the prime concern. COMPENDIUM OF MATERIALS AND PROCEDURES The Compendium of Materials and Procedures is a correlated list of materials and procedures prepared for use with the Wisconsin Prototypic System of Reading Instruction. The entries in the Compendium are keyed to the Outline of Reading Skills in the same manner as the Pro- totypic Exercises and the Inventory. In prac- tice, then, if an individual or group is found to be having difficulty with a particular skill — say, I, Word Recognition, D2a Three-letter consonant blends — the teacher can refer to I.D2a in the Compendium for a listing of mate- rials and/or. procedures that are appropriate for use in instruction designed to help pupils to develop the skill. The entries in the Compendium are meant to be descriptive rather than prescriptive. That is, the entries represent only a relatively small sample from the variety of materials and pro- cedures available and appropriate for use in teaching most of the skills. The Compendium is intended simply to provide a nucleus of items that have been found to be useful in the field. Teachers should feel free to make use of the suggestions *if they are useful or to make sub- stitutions that are available and appropriate. The expectation is that teachers, as individuals and in faculty groups , will want to add to the entries given for most of the skills; therefore, space has been provided in the Compendium for additional notations . The Compendium is pub- lished as a Practical Paper of the Wisconsin R & D Center for Cognitive Learning. SUMMARY The five existing component parts of the Wisconsin Prototypic System of Reading Instruc- tion are reviewed in the preceding pages. The format and source of each part are given in the summary list that follows: 1 . Outline of Reading Skills . The Outline a hierarchical list of objectives in six areas of reading, can be found in the present paper and in the Individual Reading Skill Development Record. 2 . Individual Reading Skill Development Rec- ord. The Record is a file folder on which space is provided for checking off each of the specific skills that appear on the Outline. A record is kept for each pupil from kindergarten through sixth grade. 3 . Prototypic Exercises for the Assessment of Reading Skills . An exercise is provided for the assessment of each of the skills included in the areas of word recognition, comprehension, and study skills. The exercises are presented, reduced in size , in the final portion of this paper and the full-size exercises are packaged in an envelope, with the recommendation that they be inserted into individual plastic folders and placed in a ring binder for easy reference. 4. Wisconsin Expanding Inventory of Reading Development . The Inventory is designed for group assessment of the same skills covered by the exercises. Individual booklets are available by area and level (e.g. Word Recog- nition, Level A, etc.). There are fourteen booklets in all. 5. Compendium of Materials and Procedures . The Compendium, a list of materials and pro- cedures appropriate for use in teaching the skills covered by the Exercises, is a Practical Paper of the R & D Center. Suggestions are keyed to the Outline of Reading Skills. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROTOTYPIC SYSTEM The fact that the prototypic system is not conceived as an instant reading program or a self-administering instructional sequence has already been pointed out. The system is con- ceived as a collection of essentials from which a reading program that meets local needs can be built and from which the'individualization of reading instruction can proceed. Because the latter is so, there is no escaping the fact that a decision to work with the system will mean that everybody iiivolved is likely to find him- self confronted with a great deal of work, par- ticularly at the early stages of implementation. We make no apologies: To individualize assess- ment and instruction is no easy task. The discussion that follows has to do with implementing the prototypic system. There are several specific concerns. First, if implemen- tation of the system is to proceed in a reason- ably straightforward manner, then certain as- sumptions regarding commitment and attitudes should be met. These assumptions are dis- cussed. Second, the need for inservice efforts is recognized and some relevant topics for con- sideration are suggested. Third, a rationale for grouping is presented. And, finally, there are some suggestions specifically for imple- mentation in Unitized and non— Unitized school's. Unfortunately, there are few pat answers to the questions that persist regarding implementation, but the discussion is based upon lessons we learned from the field tryout. GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS Four general assumptions that we feel are essential to the successful implementation of the prototypic system are discussed here. The assumptions should be considered and consen- sus reached before implementation is undertaken. Total Staff Involvement Individualization of instruction in reading through the use of the prototypic system is not likely to get to a functional level without the active participation and support of an entire school faculty. The Individual Record, the Prototypic Exercises, and the Inventory are all designed to facilitate the skill development of individual pupils from kindergarten through Grade 6; and the expectation is that the flow of information- will be vertical as well as hori- zontal. Anything less than total staff partici- pation will block the flow of information about individuals as they move through the school experience. (It should be noted that individual teachers , particularly remedial teachers , have found the Record to be useful; but, of course, the usefulness of the Record is then limited to a relatively short time span and to the context of a single classroom.) Aside from assurance of an unbroken flow of communication, total staff participation is im- portant, too, because the development of the total reading program requires input, or at least understanding, from all who will be involved. The fact that the prototypic system is not the reading program has been pointed out repeatedly in the preceding pages. The task of filling in the framework provided by the system is one that demands the instructional leadership of a principal, the consultative help that may be available, and the careful consideration of the instructional staff. (There is no intent to imply that before a staff began to think about imple- mentation of the prototypic system there had been no thought or effort devoted to the instruc- tional program in reading. To the contrary, the assumption is that the staff will want to assimi- late the Strong aspects of existing practice into the hew scheme of things. Perhaps it is also realistic to assume that, in a majority of situ- ations where the system is about to be imple- mented, the" existing program was basically sound and strong: This is the kind of base from which movement toward individualized instruc- tion is likely to proceed.) Finally, total staff commitment is important because solidarity makes for esprit de corps; 13 and at a time when not only hard work but probably personal rethinking and reorganization is required, esprit can be the critical factor in the success of the effort. This is not supposed to be a treatise on group dynamics , but the fact that one or two carping critics can do great damage has been amply demonstrated. The first assumption, then, is that there be a reasonable degree of commitment of all staff members to the effort before implementation of the program is begun. The commitment can be confined to the staff of a single building; but, of course, a district- or system-wide commit- ment is preferable . Implicit here is the as sump- tion that a reasonable period of time will be devoted to the implementation. A quickie tryout for a semester or even a year is not likely to amount to anything worth- while. Implementation of the system will take time. Recognition and acceptance of the latter as a fact are the bases for the second assump- tion. Three-Year Sequence Doldrums often come after an enthusiastic start has been made in the absence of inter- mediate goals and time guidelines . There is no question that the task of working out the details and establishing the patterns of working relationships required for installing the system and getting an individualized instructional pro- gram to a fully operational stage for an entire elementary school will take considerable time. To avoid the doldrums , it is realistic to think of implementation as a two- or three-year se- quence of activities. Details of the sequence must, of course, be worked out in the local setting, but a sequence that we feel is gen- erally realistic is suggested here by way of an example . In a traditionally organized elementary school, kindergarten through Grade 6, the first year might be spent in (a) conducting the in- service sessions (see the following section of this paper for a discussion of inservice needs) felt to be a necessary requisite to the total operation; (b) actually beginning the implemen- tation — that is , administering the group/indi- vidual assessment exercises and completing the individual records up to the appropriate level — at the primary (K— 3) level in Areas I, II, and III; and (c) finding and organizing appropriate materials and procedures for teaching the Level E skills, particularly in Areas IV, V, and VI. Such an approach would permit the primary- teachers to limit their focus to the explicitly described skill areas while they lay a founda- tion of skill assessment for the total operation, and at the same time it would permit the teachers in the middle grades to begin to talk specifically about the nature and range of skills at their levels. The second year, then, could be spent in (a) continuing with Areas I, II, HI while expanding to Areas IV, V, VI in the primary grades; (b) picking up the existing individual records and continuing them in Grade 4; (c) beginning the individual records , primarily as a skill review technique for the then current year, in Grades 5 and 6; and (d) participating in inservice training and discussion sessions designed to tackle problems identified during the first year and to cope with problems as they arise in the second year. With such a sequence the system would be in full operation, insofar as the use of current individual records for initial placement and subsequent grouping are concerned , during the third year , which could be conceived as a final year for debugging. Obviously the pace could be quickened or slowed in view of local conditions . Perhaps a two-year sequence would be adequate in Unitized schools or in situations where sup- porting personnel — e.g. reading consultants, paraprofessionals- — are available. On the other hand, to introduce the system at the rate of a grade per year, beginning with kindergarten, might be desirable in some situations . Whether the pace with the latter arrangement would be too slow to maintain momentum remains to be seen: There could be a glacier effect, with slow but inexorable forward movement until all of the grades are included . An essential point here is that implementa- tion should proceed with all deliberate speed. But to keep personnel from being overwhelmed by the many tasks involved at the early stages, a realistic pace must be set and interim goals established. A second point is that attempts at evaluation in terms of achievement over the elementary grades should come only after the system has been installed and sufficiently de- bugged to be operating reasonably smoothly. Acceptance of the Flexible Approach An extremely important assumption is that the personnel involved in implementation under- stand the need and are willing to accept the responsibility for a great deal of self-directed activity. The need for discussion, consensus with regard to skills, judgments, choice of materials , and so on has been stated so fre- quently in this paper that the point may already be overmade, but it is critical. The school faculty that is not ready to accept an active role in the implementation process is best ad- vised not to become involved with the proto- typic system. For those who want them, there are as many prepackaged instructional programs as there are prepackaged meals. Both tend to be equally bland. Local Adaptations The final assumption is that local adapta- tions of the system— in view of the adminis- trative setup, philosophy, preference for methods and/or materials, etc. will be made. Such adaptations are not only expected but also can be made without doing violence to the system. INSERVICE PREPARATION OF STAFF Once a firm commitment to individualization of reading instruction through the use of the prototypic system has been made, the process of implementation can be facilitated through a series of meetings. In such a series of meet- ings some new information should be piovided, but equally or more important there should be opportunities for the immediately involved faculty group, including the principal as instruc- tional leader, to carry on the discussions and make the decisions that are required to make the system operational and fill in the substance of the total reading program. The setup and sequence of the meetings, particularly those designed for information input, will need to be worked out in view of local calendars and avail- ability of resource persons , but some general topics that appear to be basic are listed with comment . 1 . Overview and demonstration of component parts of the prototypic system. This would be primarily an input session, where the system would be presented, preferably by someone who had worked closely with its development or use in the field, and general questions about the system and specific questions about the com- ponent parts could be answered. A video tape/ kinescope devoted to introduction of the system and demonstration of the component parts will be available in late September from the Wiscon- sin R & D Center for Cognitive Learning . 2. The concept of "reading" broadly defined. "Reading" is broadly defined by the Outline of Reading Skills. If the range of skills involved is to be attended to in practice as well as in theory, then there must be general acceptance of the broad definition and some ideas on how to proceed must be developed and exchanged. (One idea, dual-groupings, is discussed in the next section of this paper as an example.) One or more sessions devoted to the examination of definitions, reading behaviors involved, and promising procedures and techniques would be desirable . 3. The concept of individualized instruction. "Individualized instruction" has come to mean quite different things to different people. At one extreme, it may imply self- selection, self- pacing, and strictly individual instruction, where the teacher interacts with each child on an individual basis. Or, it may imply indi- vidual assessment and instruction based on the needs of individuals, who might be taught individually or in groups identified on the basis of their common needs. As a school faculty moves toward a program of individualized in- struction it is extremely desirable that there be basic agreement regarding the specifics of individualization, e.g. basic assumptions, administrative setup, working relationships. Consideration of existing viewpoints and knowl- edge prior to making the decisions that will shape local practice will be useful. 4. Discussion of essential skills. The par- ticular skills listed in the Outline of Reading Skills can provide focus for discussion of scope, sequence and specificity of an accept- able, maximally useful statement of essential skills for use in the local setting. Such dis- cussions may lead to modifications of the Out- line and/or additions to the Outline, say, more explicit breakdown into sub skills; or they may serve essentially to clarify and to familiarize participants with the Outline. In either case, discussion is desirable and worthwhile. In addition, through discussion of the specific skills and the behaviors involved, teachers can move toward consensual standards of mas- tery, which is vital if the Individual Records are to be meaningful. 5. The overall testing program. At some point it will be necessary to consider the relationship of the nonstandardized assessment instruments included with the prototypic system to (a) the- standardized testing program that exists or is contemplated and (b) locally developed informal instruments that may exist. With regard to the latter, the suggestion is that any informal in- strument that has been found to be useful ought to be retained and used to acquire supplementary information that can be useful in making judg- ments about the skill attainment of individuals. On the other hand, the decision may be to cut back on standardized testing and/or to seek tests for the general assessment of reading achievement that are most closely in line with the objectives of the instructional program in reading. 6. Materials and procedures. A general ses- sion on materials and procedures might profitably come after smaller groups have had an opportu- nity to conduct a search at given levels. The purpose would be to acquaint each teacher with particularly useful materials and ideas at various levels . The Compendium of Materials and Procedures can serve as a starting point. 7. Planning/feedback sessions . Brief but frequent sessions devoted to common problems and short-range plans should be scheduled, some for the total group and some for subgroups, e.g. teachers concerned with teaching skills at a given level. Such sessions need not take more than 20—30 minutes, but they probably should be scheduled on a weekly basis. One focus for such sessions, aside from dealing with problems as they arise, could be consid- eration of regrouping for certain individuals as skill development profiles change. 8. Orientation for new teachers. Each fall, and at other times as needed, one or more orientation sessions should be held to acquaint new teachers with the system and its compo- nent's. Unless this is done, faculty commit- ment to and participation in the program will gradually become eroded through lack of infor- mation and active involvement. Unit leaders, or their counterparts in traditional schools , are likely to be in the best position to conduct such sessions . GROUPING FOR INSTRUCTION Current Individual Records provide informa- tion that can be the basis for intelligent group- ing as well as for determining individual in- structional needs. In the field tryout it was clear that the most acceptable and workable approach to the individualization of instruction was through flexible grouping. The discussion that follows is, therefore, devoted to ideas and procedures for grouping within the context of the prototypic system. Initial Grouping When school starts in the fall, most teachers are anxious to get their pupils into at least tentative reading groups as quickly as possible. This initial grouping can be expedited by the use of the Wisconsin Expanding Inventory of Reading Development and the Individual folders. The latter will, of course, be available for initial grouping only in instances where the system was in operation during the preceding year, but the Inventory can be administered and scored to yield base line information very early in the fall semester. With either or, preferably, both sets of indi- vidual data available, grouping can proceed in a straightforward manner: Within a grade level or within a Unit of whatever composition, pupils can be assigned to groups by commonality of skill development status. The range of skills to be considered can be expanded or restricted in view of the total number of groups to be formed. That is, placement within a level (A, B, C, D, E) might be considered to be sufficient commonality if relatively few groups were to be formed; whereas , much more explicit focus upon specific skills might be considered if more and smaller groups were to be formed initially. The size of the group and the basis for the initial grouping is of less importance than the fact of grouping for purposes of management. The important point, of course, is that the initial groups must be conceived as strictly temporary; from these groups pupils are to be deployed to other groups as their needs change. Realistically, Skill Areas I, II, and III prob- ably serve as an adequate base for initial group- ing. Informal reading inventories, in addition to the Records, will be useful as a guide to the selection of reading materials for the groups and for individuals within the initial groups . A final word about initial groups: No matter what the criteria for forming them , the groups will be obsolescent in a very short time and obsolete within a month. This is a fact and most teachers recognize it. Nevertheless, many people continue to devise elaborate schemes for fall grouping and to take a month or two to carry them out; then they are too awed with their magnificent handiwork to tamper with the groups for the rest of the year. When the focus is to be upon the individuals who consti- tute the groups, there is less likelihood of becoming bogged down with group: When pupils no longer share the need for which they were grouped, they should no longer share the group. Subsequent Grouping Subsequent grouping should be as straight- forward a process as initial grouping: Examina- tion of the Records should lead to identification of pupils with common skill development needs, and these needs become the bases for grouping. Such flexibility calls for continuous assess- ment of individuals' skill development through the use of the prototypic exercises and reas- signment of pupils to new groups . Where there is to be interclassroom or intra-Unit mobility for readincr instruction, provision must be made for planning, discussion of profiles and re- placement, probably not less than once each week. This is the point at which some teachers, confronted with the need for continuous assess- ment and regrouping throw up their hands and wonder where they are going to find time for all that. Unfortunately there is no pat reply that is guaranteed to fire the questioner with enthu- siasm. The individualization of instruction, even with a basis for efficient grouping, does 16 take time. The response here must be that the prototypic system is designed to be useful to teachers as they tackle the necessary tasks . Furthermore, it should be clear that the assess- ment of skill development is an integral part of the teaching of reading. Time should be budg- eted each week— probably up to one-third of the time available for reading instruction for assessment and for planning instruction on the bases of current data regarding individual skill development. Somehow a substantial number of teachers apparently have come to place more importance upon getting on to the next story in the reading text than upon the development of essential reading skills for each individual. This misplacement of emphasis is a product of slavish dedication to curriculum guides that are tied to grade levels. Fifteen minutes of instruction that is well planned in response to an individual need is likely to be more produc- tive than an hour of let’s-go-on-to-the-next- page instruction. Time spent in assessment activities offers every promise of being time well spent. Sometimes the most efficient instruction is done with a single individual. As pupils’ Rec- ords are examined for grouping purposes , some pupils with unique problems will be found . They should be dealt with individually • Refer- rals for special remedial or psychological help can be made when necessary. With constant assessment, special needs can be recognized and appropriate help provided at a very early stage, when the prognosis for recovery is most favorable . Placement of Transfer Pupils Pupils who transfer into a situation where individual records of reading development are being kept current can be placed in the instruc- tional program and considered for grouping with relative ease. The procedure would be to give and score the appropriate portions of the Expand- ing Inventory (or the appropriate prototypic exer- cises, depending on preference) in order to establish a base level of skill development on the Record. From the resul-tant profile, decis- ions could be made about placement in the in- structional sequence and about possible group- ing. A Plan for Dual Grouping Most of what has been said to this point has had to do with the skills listed in the Outline under I, Word Recognition, II, Comprehension, and III, Study Skills. There are two reasons: first, specific assessment exercises have been developed for the three areas; and second, most of the skills in Areas IV, Self-directed Reading, V, Interpretive Reading, and VI, Crea- tive Reading, require prolonged observations in relatively unstructured situations if assess- ments are to have validity. The fact that spe- cific skills involved in Areas IV, V, and VT are listed in the Outline and on the Record provides some structure, for observations can be focused upon particular skills for selected time periods. By checking on individual competence with the various skills involved, a teacher can insure not neglecting vital skills. To insure systematic observations in the three areas , however , a plan for grouping and for focusing upon the skills is desirable. One such plan has been devised by Mrs. DeLores VanderVelde of the Madison Public Schools and found to be viable. Basically, it is a plan for dual grouping: A pupil is placed in one group according to his needs for instruction and skill development in the foundation, or tool, areas of word recogni- tion, comprehension and study skills; and he is placed in a second group according to teach- ers' judgments regarding their perceptions of his attitudes and abilities in the areas of self- directed, interpretive and creative reading. To accomplish the latter, a check-sheet (shown on the following page) to assist in making judg- ments in several areas has been devised. Use of the check sheet would permit teach- ers to examine general behaviors and to group pupils with similar attitudes and/or abilities. There appear to be at least two advantages. First, the behaviors in the areas of concern here are not necessarily tied directly to skill status in the foundation areas . That is , a child might have the basic word recognition skills, have the basic study skills, and be able to cope with literal comprehension, but be unmotivated where self-directed reading for enjoyment is concerned and at a loss so far as creative or interpretive reading is concerned. The dual grouping scheme permits the teacher to focus separately on the latter areas in set- ting up groups and in planning library and re- lated experiences. Second, the task of making specific judgments regarding Area IV, V, VI skills is made more manageable by bringing pupils with generally similar characteristics together. The plan seems sufficiently promising to merit additional tryout and refinement. Role of Paraprofessionals This is not the place to become involved in a general discussion of the role of paraprofes- sionals (or teacher aides or whatever local terminology happens to be applied to describe personnel who are not fully certified as profes- sional teachers and whose essential function is to assist teachers) because, at least for the forseeable future, the specifics will need to 17 Name Grade (Underline the appropriate characteristic and rate each generalization on the five-point scale.) Almost Always 1 — Usually At Times i Seldom Only when directed 1. Enjoys reading appropriate to his level - efficiency 2. Reads with interpretation in the subject matter areas understanding facts 3. Considers opinions in drawing conclusions inferences dramatizes .... 4. Exhibits evidence of creative impact of reading: ^ ustrates writes reads more .... plot 5 . Reacts personally to environment in story reading characters Fig. 1. Check Sheet for Self-Directed, Interpretive, and Creative Reading continue to be worked out at the local level and, realistically, in view of the qualifications and aptitudes of individuals . Nevertheless, it seems clear that paraprofessionals , when they are available, could assume a number of spe- cific responsibilities in the operation of the prototypic system, particularly with regard to activities that can be subsumed under grouping as a general area of concern. Again, these roles must be worked out explicitly in the local setting, but some suggestions can be made here . An obvious starting point for participation would be the administration of the Wisconsin Expanding Inventory of Reading Development. Teachers should probably participate in the scoring, particularly when judgments that are to be recorded on the individual records are to be made, but it would appear that much of the scoring task could be handled by paraprofes- sionals. With teacher direction, many of the prototypic exercises could also be administered by paraprofessionals; but, again, judgments to be recorded on the individual folders should be the responsibility of teachers . Paraprofessionals can play an extremely useful role in facilitating instruction by work- ing with small groups or individuals on skills that are causing difficulties. Specific skill deficits can be located from inspection of indi- vidual records , suggestions for corrective/ developmental help can be found in the com- pendium, a plan of action can be formulated in consultation with the teacher, and the activi- ties prescribed can be carried out. (An impor- tant finding from research on motivation is that in situations where adults are able to spend relatively brief periods of time working with 18 pupils on desired behaviors the results, in terms of pupil behaviors, have been good. The proto- typic system can provide the structure for a pro- gram in which para professionals work briefly but regularly with individuals on the develop- ment of specific reading skills in a sequential, developmental order . More exploratory work with this particular scheme is planned for the next stage of refinement of the prototypic system.) IMPLEMENTATION IN THE MULTIUNIT SCHOOL The Multiunit school — a concept that has been undergoing development, field tryout, and refinement within a project at the Wisconsin R & D Center — provides a receptive setting for implementation of the prototypic system of reading instruction. As already pointed out, four of the five schools in the 1967—68 field tryout of the prototypic system were Multiunit schools. Because the- Multiunit concept and the concept of a prototypic system of reading instruction are in many ways complementary , implementation in the Multiunit setting is spe- cifically discussed. The organization of the Multiunit school is very briefly reviewed -along with suggestions for implementation. The or- ganizational chart of a hypothetical Multiunit school of 600 elementary pupils is given in Figure 2. Key groups that operate at three I i I I I i i Representative Teachers Representative Unit Leaders Central Office Personnel | Principal «# Principals of Other Schools Other Consultants I I I I I I I J IMC Director r Unit Leader A Unit Leader B 5 Teachers 5 Teachers Teacher Aide Teacher Aide Instructional Instructional Secretary Secretary Intern Intern 150 Students 150 Students I Ages 4-6 Ages 6-9 External Consultants Unit Leader C Unit Leader D I 5 Teachers Teacher Aide Instructional Secretary Intern 150 Students Ages 8-11 5 Teachers Teacher Aide Instructional Secretary Intern 150 Students Ages 10-12 Unit A Unit B Unit C Unit D Building Instructional Improvement Committee m System-Wide Policy Committee Fig. 2. Organization Chart of a Multiunit School of 600 Students (From H. J. Klausmeier, R. G. Morrow, and J. E. Walter. The multiunit organization (I & R units) and elementary e ducation in the decades ahe a d Madison: Wisconsin R & D Center for Cognitive Learning, 1968.) ERJC iminaffammaa 19 distinct levels in the organizational hierarchy are represented there. Numbers of pupils and personnel involved will of course, vary in practice . The System-Wide Policy Committee, chaired by the superintendent or his representa- tive, operates at the district level and includes relevant central office staff and consultants , principals from the Unitized schools, and rep- resentative Unit leaders and teachers. This group meets less frequently than the other two, but decisions with implications for the entire district are made at this level. With regard to the adoption and implementation of prototypic systems of instruction— in reading and in other curriculum areas — the role of the group is to consider the facts and, if such is their decision, to endorse and to disseminate relevant informa- tion to the schools and to the community. The Instructional Improvement Committee is chaired by the building principal and operates at the building level. Unit leaders within the building are permanent members and consultants from available sources are involved as needed. The committee meets weekly and, among other things, takes leadership with regard to alloca- tions of time , organization for instruction, consideration of materials and approaches to assessment, use of special personnel, and inservice activities . Decisions of the com- mittee are communicated and executed by the Unit leaders. With these functions the Instruc- tional Improvement Committee has a vital role in the implementation of the prototypic system of reading instruction. At the outset, decisions with regard to the sequence and timing — that is, at what level to begin and how rapidly to proceed of the imple- mentation process must be made, and a series of interim goals and a scheme for eliciting and evaluating feedback must be established. The responsibility here is clearly with the Instruc- tional Improvement Committee. Decisions must be made , too , about the general acceptability of the scope and sequence statement in the Outline — that is, can it be accepted as is or are certain general revisions necessary to meet local needs and expectations — and about the general content of the other component parts of the system. Such decisions are, of course, guideline decisions, for basic, operational changes— deletions, additions , revisions— must be made in view of feedback from experi- ence with the system. Leadership for obtaining the latter and effecting the changes required must come from the Instructional Improvement Committee. The Committee must also make the general decisions and provide the leadership for building a locally acceptable and appropriate reading program around the framework provided by the prototypic system. Care must be taken to see that the proposed reading program fits into the general instructional program without doing violence to any other subject matter area(s) . The Committee is in a position to see that (a) enthusiasm for a particular curriculum area does not result in neglect, even temporar- ily, of the remaining areas; and (b) over a period of time all areas receive special atten- tion, i.e. clarification of behavioral objectives , clarification of effective approaches to assess- ing pupils' skill development status at short intervals and over the entire elementary school experience, and consideration of effective means for offering instruction that is truly indi- vidualized . The Unit operates at the classroom level and includes the Unit leader, a professional teacher who teaches from one-half to two-thirds time; the regular teachers assigned to the Unit; and, when available, a teacher aide and/or an instructional secretary. The instruc- tional process is determined cooperatively within the Unit and is executed by Unit mem- bers. Thus, it is within the Unit that each child's achievement, progress, and other characteristics are assessed. These assess- ments — which are particularly vital to the successful operation of the prototypic system in reading — tend to be more accurate and com- prehensive when the professional knowledge and perceptions of the several Unit members are brought to bear. Sharpened perceptions of individual characteristics and needs make fre- quent regrouping possible and redesigning of instructional approaches feasible. And, equally important, the Unit operation makes possible the pooling of strengths and competencies of several teachers with resultant upgrading of instruction. There are, then, many ways in which the Unit can expedite the implementation of the prototypic system. It is vital that at least two hours per week be set aside for Unit meetings: of this , one-third to one-half could realistically be scheduled for consideration of the operation of the prototypic system during the first two years of implementation. (Klausmeier , Morrow, and Walter have addressed themselves to the problems of finding time for such meetings and they have suggested several approaches .) ^Much more explicit details regarding roles and responsibilities are given in The mult iunit or- ganization (I & R units) and elementary educa_^ tion in the decades ahead by H. J. Klausmeier, R. G. Morrow, and J. E. Walter. Madison: Wisconsin R & D Center for Cognitive Learning, 1968 . The essential point here is that the Multi- unit setup is a receptive environment for the prototypic system in reading and the system provides a base of specifics for the Unit opera- tion. The complementary nature of the Unit- system operation is particularly clear in the following instances. (1) The Unit is a con- venient operating group to make decisions about skill development, which demand experi- ence, discussion and consensus if the assess- ment process is to be productive. That is, the facilitation of communication and the sharing of perceptions within a Unit are basic to the decision-making process with regard to assess- ing individuals' skill status and, subsequently, providing for individualized instruction. (2) The Unit operation makes for pooling of ideas regarding materials and procedures appropriate for use in developing specific skills. (3) Con- tinual assessment of pupils and freedom of movement within a Unit is conducive to the kind of grouping necessary to insure individuali- zation of instruction. IMPLEMENTATION IN THE TRADITIONAL SCHOOL "Traditional school" is defined here as any school that is not Unitized. This, of course, is not a very useful definition, for the variety of administrative setups and instructional emphases lumped together is virtually limitless. Yet, to attempt to direct specific discussions to specific setups would be unmanageable. The discussion is, therefore, limited to sev- eral general points . First, as already pointed out, there is no inherent need to limit implementation of the system to any particular administrative setup. The focus is upon individual performance. Second, a number of assumptions and general requirements for operation of the system have been pointed out. These should be considered carefully before implementation is attempted. To begin without adequate staff commitment or a realistic time schedule is not only undesir- able, but probably futile. Third, the task of implementation will be greatly eased if groups are formed within the school building to have concerns and responsibilities similar to those of the Instructional Improvement Committee and the Unit in the Unitized setting. The parallel to the Instructional Improvement Committee might comprise the principal and representative teachers from two to four levels; and the paral- lel to the Unit could comprise all of the teach- ers at a level, with one teacher designated "chairman." The essential point is that work- ing groups must be established to insure com- munication and pupil mobility; without this , the impact of the system so far as individualization of instruction is concerned is almost certain to be dissipated or completely lost. PROTOTYPIC EXERCISES FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF READING SKILLS Reductions of the Prototypic Exercises are given below and on the pages that follow. If a key is provided for an exercise, it is given immediately following the exercise. The key is given on the back of the exercise in the full-size version for actual use. 1 i. 2 WORD RECOGNITION I. WORD RECOGNITION Al. Listens for rhyming words and sounds, phrases, and verses. a) Rhyming words TEACHER: Do the names of these pictures rhyme? sled chin fish socks train ^ frog (continued on following page) Ala. Rhyming words. TEACHER: Listen to the words I say. Do these words rhyme? man pan call bell sing thing leg beg thin hen can rat big twig park play hat sat when pen 22 O ERIC I. WORD RECOGNITION Alb. Rhyming Phrases and Verses rhyme'.' "tcU L'ttUwdii 1 ®™ TO TEAChIr: y if you think the nonsense rhymes will be too distracting, omit them.) 1, "Little Jack Horner Sat in a corner." "Humpty, Dumpty sat on a wall Humpty, Dumpty had a great fall. 3. "Do you know why There are stars in the sky?" "Wing, wong, way Tisha, looma say 5. "Looma see, looma so Tisha looma, taffy mo I. WORD RECOGNITION A2. Notes likenesses and differences in pictures, letters, words, and phrases. a) Pictures TEACHER: Point to the two pictures that are the same in «anh 1 i nn . TEACHER* I am going to tell you a j ingle » but I am ASt gSing to flnisR it. You finish if for me by telling me a rhyming word. 1. The big tall man Fried eggs in a . 2, It is so much fun To jump, and skip, and • down it down the find big want car end big from from as to what see how see other like jump were did see jump hill blue go hill our not run help me not wanted laugh kitten thank wanted happy what happy out stop did jump cow did ran (continued on following page) 23 7 TEACHER: Point to the group of words that is the same as the first one in each line. in a pan under the table in a pan around the town up the tree behind the door may not go up the tree to the store to the store up a hill just so big up and down something wonderful at the corner up and down back and forth in and out back and forth found it 8 I. WORD RECOGNITION A3. Distinguishes sizes TO THE TEACHER: Ask the child to point to the thing that is biggest for numbers 1 and 3: to point to the smallest for numbers 2 and 5; and to point to the thing that is the middle size for numbers 4 and 6. 2 - ^ S? 3 . A A * <■ o O o ☆ c 9 9B I. WORD RECOGNITION* A4. Distinguishes colors TEACHER: Point to the color I say. TEACHER KEY: TO THE TEACHER: Color rectangles on the exercise card according to the following key: Word Rectangle Rectangle blue black blue green red green black purple black yellow yellow white red green red orange orange brown white yellow white brown black brown purple purple blue NOTE TO THE TEACHER: A child who cannot discriminate between red and green on both examples should, perhaps, be tested by the school nurse for color blindness. o ERIC 24 10 11 I. WORD RECOGNITION A5. Distinguishes shapes of objects TEACHER*. Find the two that are the same shape. I. WORD RECOGNITION A6, Listens for initial consonant sounds TEACHER: Do the words I say begin alike? bird ball boy take mother monkey house hair light baby candy cake nurse yard feather farm fish girl banana dog 12 I. WORD RECOGNITION Bl. Has sight word vocabulary of 50-100 words. TO THE TEACHER: Assessment of the size of a sight vocabulary must necessarily be tied to the particular materials that have been and are being used . reading instruction. Speeific words be selected from materials used. .The Dolch List of 220 words is provided because it includes many useful words that are frequently encountered. It should be understood, however, that (a) the list must be augmented with words from materials used and (b) known words may appear on any or all of the sublists. In testing sight vocabulary, the emphasis should be upon quick recognition. A good procedure is to put individual words on flash cards and to present each word for a maximum of five seconds. (After sight recognition has .been established you may want to allow more time to determine whether the pupil can use other word recognition techniques to get the word.) You can note the method of attack to determine what skills are used, if any . and whether there is a tendency to over- anaiyze the woratf. You may use the following list as a reference when making your flash cards. Alternative word lists may be used. Some suggested lists are the Botel word list or the Sullivan word list. An additional suggestion would be to develop a word list using the vocabulary of the basal reader you use. 13 Bl. (cont’d.) I. WORD RECOGNITION Pre primer 1. a Primer 1 . all 2. and 2. am 3. away 3. are 4. big 4. at 5 . blue 5. ate 6. can 6. be 7. come 8. down 9 . find 8. * brown 9. but 10. for 10. came 11. funny 11. did 12. go 12. do 13. help 13. eat 14. here 14. four 15. I 15. get 16. in 16. good 17. is 17. nave 18. it 18. he 19. jump 19. into 20. little 20. like 21. look 21. must 22. make 22. new 23. me 23. no 24. my 24. now 25. not 25. on 26. one 26. our 27. play 27. out 28. red 28. please 29. run 29. pretty 30. sa id 30. ran 31. see 31. ride 32. the 32. saw 33. three 33. say 34. too 34. she 35. two 35. so 36. up 36. soon 37. we 37. that 38. where 38. there 39. you 39. they 40. this 41. too 42. under 43. want 44. was 45. well 46. went 47. what 48. white 49. who 50. will 51. , with 52. , yellow 1. 2 . 3. 4. 5. 6 . 7. 8 . 9. 10 . 11 . 12 . 13. 14. 15. 16. 17, 18. 19. 20 . 21 , 22 . 23. 24. 25. 26. 27, 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36 37 38 39 40 41 1 after agaiit an any as ask by could every |iy from give going had has her him his how just .know let 1 ive may of old once open over pot round some stop take thank them then think walk were when 1. always 2. around 3. because 4. been 5. before 6. best 7. both 8. buy 9. call 10. cold 11. does 12. don't 13. fast 14. first 15. five 16. found 17. gave 18. goes 19. green 20. its 21. made 22. many 23. off 24. or 25. pull 26. read 27. right 28. sing 29. sit 30. sleep 31. tell 32. their 33. these 34. those 35. upon 36. us 37. use 38. very 39. wash 40. which 41. why 42. wish 43. work 44. would 45. write 46. your 1. about 2. better 3. bring 4. carry 5. clean 6. cut 7. done 8. draw 9. drink 10. eight 11. fall 12. far 13. full 14. got 15. grow 16. hold 17. hot 18. hurt 19. if 20. keep 21. kind 22. laugh 23. light 24. long 25. much 26. myself 27. never 28. only 29. own 30. pick 31. seven 32. shall 33. show 34. six 35. small 36. start 37. ten 38. today 39. together 40. try 41 . warm 25 I. WORD RECOGNITION 14 I. WORD RECOGNITION B2. Follows left to right sequence TEACHER; Name the letter or numbers in each line. man pet c 0 e g ball boy girl bird 4 7 1 2 mother map Sam sit P F B ,D light fair Pig leaf d P 1 k fish gate 16 I. WORD RECOGNITION 15 B3a. 1 ) Consonant sounds Beginning TEACHER; Do these words begin alike? (Teacher reads child does not see word list.) TEACHER: Tell me another word that begins like each word I say. What letter makes this sound? (Teacher reads — child does not see word list.) boy man nest gate light fish pig 17 B3a, Consonant sounds 2) Ending TEACHER: Do these words end alike? (Teacher reads- child does not see word list.) bat pen Pig ant cup car nap cat six look hut can pin hot cot pit lip pan sit sink TEACHER: Tell me which letter makes the ending sound for each wqrd I say. (Teacher reads— child does not see word list . ) bat pin cup car ball B3b. I. WORD RECOGNITION Consonant blends TEACHER; Listen carefully for the first two sounds in each word I say. Point to the pictures that begin the same way. (Teacher reads words— child sees only pictures. Covers lower half of page.) (tr) "tray (fr) "from" & < 5 ^ (br) " brin 'V^^ y each word I say. Which i two words begin the (bl) blanket broom blouse (gr) glow grapes groceries (pr) prize pray play (fl) flag frown flower (gl) grow glass glad (cr) crayon cloud crown (pl) plant play proud o ERIC 26 18 I. WORD RECOGNITION 19 I. WORD RECOGNITION B3c. Rhyming elements TEACHER: Tell me a word that rhymes with each of these words. (Teacher reads-—child does not soe the word list.} B3d; Short vowels TEACHER: Tell me the vowel sound you hear in each word I say. What letter makes that sound? (Teacher reads — child does not see word list.) 20 pan ball sat far when 21 I. WORD RECOGNITION man pin cup hen doll duck pan bed sit hop I. WORD RECOGNITION B3e. Knows simple consonant digraphs TO THE TEACHER: Give an example after explanation. TEACHER: Two consonants often go together to make a new sound. These consonants are called digraphs. Tell me the digraphs in each of the words I say. (Teacher reads — child does not see word list.) she chalk teeth ship cheese with fish church beach thumb B4a . Compound words TO THE TEACHER: Explain compound words, if necessary. TEACHER: Tell me the compound word in each sentence. Then tell me each of the words in the compound word. (Teacher reads — child does not see sentences.) 1. The cowboy likes to ride on his horse.. 2. The policeman helped me to cross the street. 3. We saw something in the road. 4. There is a birdhouse in the tree. 5. The boys like to play football . 27 22 I. WORD RECOGNITION ■ 23 I. WORD RECOGNITION B4b. Contractions TEACHER: Say these words. Then use each sentence. word in a B4c. Base words and known endings TEACHER: Tell me the root word in each word that I say. napped I’m catches it’s runs that ’s batting can’t scolded don’t taller strongest played running 24 ' I. WORD RECOGNITION 25 I. WORD RECOGNITION B4d. Plurals TEACHER : Tell me whether there is one or more (Teacher reads — child does not see word list.) than one. B4e. Possessive forms TO THE TEACHER: Repeat the underlined word after each sentence . TEACHER: Does this word mean more than one, or does it tell that something belongs to someone. boy eyes 1 , The girl’s dress was pretty. cheese 2. The dogs began to bark. bikes 3. Mary’s mother called her for dinner. boxes 4. The wheel came off Ann’s wagon. lady 5. The ladies ate dinner. wheels 6. The boys played ball. buses 7. The teachers played a game with us. 8. My dad’s car is red. 9. The cat’s tail is black. 10. The mothers held their babies. 28 26 26B I. WORD RECOGNITION TEACHER KEY: SUMMARY CARD — LEVEL B Tom’s grandfather gave him a brown pony for his birthday. Tom named his pony Brownie. Tom loved his pony. He took good care of him. Everyday Tom gave the pony food and water. In the summer, Tom's friends came to visit. Tom wanted them to see Brownie. He called the pony and gave him an apple. Tom let his friends ride his pony. They all had a good time. 1 . him, his, in , visit, (accept any of these words) 2. grandfather , birthday 3. brown 4. friends 5. grandfather , them, they (accept any of these words) 6. Tom's 1. Find three words that have the vowel sound you hear in pin . 2. Sometimes two words are put together to make a new word, like playground. Find two more compound words in the story. 3. Find a word in the story that begins like bring and names color . 4. Find a word in the story that begins like frog and means pals. ” 5. Find two words jn the story that have the th sound you hear in the . — 6. What word in the story tells us grandfather belonged to Tom? 27 I. WORD RECOGNITION SUMMARY CARD — LEVEL B Mother wanted Bill and Sally to be safe when they crossed the street. On the way to school she asked Bill, "Which light tells us to go?" "The green light," answered Bill. "That’s right, Bill,” said Mother. "Sally, which light tells us to wait?" Sally answered, "i know.' It is the yellow light." Mother said, "Very good.' Be sure you do what it says. Who can tell me which light tells us to stop?" Both of the children shouted, "The red light does.’" "That was not hard," said Bill. Mother said, "I am happy that you know what the lights tell you to do. I know my children will be safe when they cross the street." 1. Find a word in the story that rhymes with bed and is the name of a color. 2. Find a word in the story that is the name of one of the children and rhymes with will . 3. Find two words in the story that begin like boy . 4. Find three words in the story that end like den . 5. Which word in the story is a color and begins like grow? 6. Sally said to Mother, "it is the yellow light that tells us to wait. ' What one word could Sally have said that means it is ? 7. Find a word in the story that means more than one light. 8. Find a word in the story that means more than one child. 27B TEACHER KEY: 1 . red 2. Bill 3. Bill, both, be (accept any two) 4. green, can, children 5. green 6. it's 7. lights 8. children 29 28 I. WORD RECOGNITION Cl. Has sight * 0 rd vocabulary of 100-to-170 words. TO THE TEACHER: Assessment of the size of a sight vocabulary must necessarily be tied to the particular materials that have been and are being used for reading instruction. Specific words must, therefore, be selected from materials used. The Dolch List of 220 wordsis provided because it includes many useful words that are frequently encountered. It should be understood, however, that (a) the list must be augmented with words from materials used and (b) known words may appear on any or all of the sublists. In testing sight vocabulary, the emphasis should be upon quick recognition. A good procedure is to put individual words on flash cards and to present each ward for a maximum of five seconds. (After sight recognition has been established you may want to allow more time to determine whether the pupil car* use other word recognition techniques to get the word.) You can note the method of attack to determine what skills are used, if any and whether there is a tendency to over- analyze the words. You mav use the word list on page 13 as a reference when making your flash cards. Alternative ward lists may be used. Some suggested lists are the Botel word list or the Sullivan word list. An additional suggestion would be to develop a word list using the vocabulary of the basal reader you use. 29 I. WORD RECOGNITION G2a. Consonants and their variant sounds TO THE TEACHER: Have the child read the following words. treasure ask picnic house circus police giant strange good get trees busy drag cake cage city sure 30 31 I. WORD RECOGNITION C2b. Consonant blends TEACHER: Listen carefi ___ _ word that I say. Which words begin alike? I . WORD RECOGNITION TEACHER: ^isten carefully for. the first two sounds in each C2c . Vowel sounds 1) Long vowel sounds (st) stove snowman stairs TEACHER: Read these words to me and tell which you hear in each word. Some of the real words. We call them nonsense words. (sk) skate skunk star nose skates (sm) smile spoon smoke (sp) swing spool spider cake use (sw) sweater swing sk irt ice seat (sn) snail stove snake goat tie cheese cute TEACHER : Tell me a word that begins like each word I say. rebe labe smell store sky spell swell brile treep goam prane 30 o 35B 36 I. WORD RECOGNITION TEACHER KEY: 1. long 2. short 3. short 4. long 5. short 6. short 7. long 8. long 37 C2d . Vowel rules 1) Short vowel generalization TO THE TEACHER: Have the child read the following words. Tell him that some of the words are nonsense words. cat lut hot mab bus 1 is sit fom red seb 4 TEACHER: When there is only one vowel in a word, and that vowel is in the middle of the word, is that vowel TO THE TEACHER: Call attention to exceptions such as hold, cold, bold, comb, climb, night, sight, fight, light. 38 I. WORD RECOGNITION I, WORD RECOGNITION C2d. Vowel rules 2) Silent e rule TO THE TEACHER: Have the child read the following words. Tell him that some of the words are nonsense words. C2d. Vowel rules 3) Two vowels together FO THE TEACHER: Have the child read the following words, rell him that some of the words are nonsense woids. cake dibe nice mape rope heke tube sule Pete jome day gaip train soam boat tay meat kiel tied pread TEACHER: When there is an e at the end of a word, what sound does the vowel before it usually have? TO THE TEACHER: Call attention to exceptions such as give, come, have, prove, etc. JACHER: When two vowels are together in a word, what wind does the first vowel have, and what sound aoes le second vowel have? ) THE TEACHER: The above generalization is usually true >r these vowel combinations: ai, ea , oa , ay , ee , and ow. ; isnot always applicable for the ie or ei combination. 32 O ERIC 39 I. WORD RECOGNITION 40 I. WORD RECOGNITION C2d. Vowel rules 4) Final vowel TO THE TEACHER: Have the child read the following words. C2e. Knows common consonant digraphs TO THE TEACHER: Give examples after explanation. TEACHER: Two consonants often go together to make a new sound. These consonants are called digraphs. Tell me the digraphs in each of the words I say. (Teacher reads child does not see word list.) go she me he so hi TEACHER: If there is one vowel in a one syllable word and it comes at the end of the word, what sound does it usually have? 41 42 I. WORD RECOGNITION sink what .where shining win£ thank chicken wishing thing wh ich back long I. WORD RECOGNITION C3. Has structural skills a) Base words with prefixes and suffixes TO THE TEACHER: An example may be given, if it is necessary. ) C3. Structural skills, b) More difficult plural forms TEACHER: Tell me whether there is one or more than one. (Teacher reads - child does not see word list.) TEACHER: Make a word to finish each sentence by adding a beginning (or prefix), a suffix (or an ending). Use the word next to the sentence as a part of your new word. 1 . An umbrella is on a rainy day. (use) 2. The teacher is on the chalkboard. (write) 3. Harry was when he lost the dime. (happy) 4. Billy is the boy in the class, (tall) 5. You should b 19 to your classmates. (friend) 6. A key will the door, (lock) 7. These birds fly than those birds. (high) 8. Our dog has six . (puppy) 9. Do not be with your toys, (care) 10. Ann was so that she went to bed. (sleep) mice circus child dresses men lady goose noses houses children 33 0 ERIC 43 44 I. WORD RECOGNITION C4a. Distinguishes between homonyms. TO THE TEACHER: Have the child read and complete the following sentences. TEACHER: Tell me the word you would use to complete each sentence correctly. 1. Mother bought some for dinner, (meet, meat) 2. The boat has a . (sail, sale) 3. The rabbit went into a . (hole, whole) 4. A sleeps all winter, (bare, bear) 5. comes after three. (Four, For)* X. WORD RECOGNITION C4b. Distinguishes between, a synonym and an antonym. TEACHER: Tell me whether these pairs of words are opposite or the same. (Teacher reads - child does not see word list.) strong weak pretty ugly quiet silent let allow little big frightened scared girl boy quit StO fj black whit» present gift 45 WORD RECOGNITION 46 WORD RECOGNITION C5. Has independent and varied word attack skills. C6. Chooses appropriate meaning of multiple meaning wor^is. TEACHER OBSERVATION: In his free and directed reading, does the student... 1. use picture clues? TEACHER: Sometimes a word has two or more meanings, and then it is called a multiple meaning word. Here are some multiple meaning words. Tell me what the multiple meaning words in each sentence means. (Teacher reads - child does not see sentences.) 2. use contextual clues? 3. look for base words? 4. compare new words to known words? 5. note general configuration of words? 1. My hands are very cold . I made a snowman. 2. If you have a cold, stay in the house. 3. John worked for days to train his dog to walk on two feet. 4. Ttvs last car on the train was a caboose. 5. Tom was hit on the back of his head. 6. The storeman had to back his car out onto the street. 7. The boys played football in the yard back of the school . 8. Neighbors come to our house to watch TV. 9. John has on the new watch that he bought for tbis birthday. 10. Tim gave the right answer to the question. 11. Put your name in the top right hand corner of your paper. 34 3 I. WORD RECOGNITDN* SUMMARY CARD — LEVEL C There were many animals for the boy to see in the barnyard. First he saw a white hen eating wheat from a can/ After that he saw the farmer putting a shoe on the horse. An old truck for carrying farm tools was by the barn. The boy went into the barn where he saw a brand new calf sleeping by its mother. Back in a corner some fluffy baby kittens played with a ball yarn. If he stood on his toes he could see a fat pig stuck in the mud. A playful puppy tried to untie his shoe as he walked out of the barn. In front of him a mother goose and five baby geese waddled to their pen. 1 . 2 . 3. 4. 5. 6 . 7. 6 . 9 . Find another word in the story that starts with wh like wheat. Find two words in the story that begin with st. like star. and Find the two words that end with ing . and _ Sometimes two little words are put together to make one big word like barnyard. Find another word in the story made up of two little words. Find a word that begins with fi like fly. Find two words with an ed ending. and Find a word that begins with tr like tree. There is a word in the story that begins with sh like ship. What is it? What word begins like break and tells about the calf? 10. What is the word that begins with un? 11. Find a word with oo like in soon. _ 12. Find the word that tells you there was more than one goose. 13. Find the word with the ful ending. 14. Find a word that ends in ee like tree. I. WORD RECOGNITION * SUMMARY CARD — LEVEL C Elephants Elephants are the largest animals that live on land. They usually travel in the day. When it is cold or cloudy or when they are being hunted, elephants travel at night. As the animals walk along, they sometimes push down young trees. They eat the roots, twigs, and leaves of the trees. Elephants eat weeds, too. The elephant uses his trunk for many things. It is his nose and his arm and his hand. He uses his trunk to help pick up things. 1. Name one short vowel word and two long vowel words that name foods the elephant eats. 2. Find a short vowel word that names a part of the elephant's body that is very useful to him. 3. Find two words in the story that have the vowel sound you hear in mouse . 4. Find a word in the story that has the w#el sound you hear in talk . 5. Find two homonyms in the story for ’’two.” 6. Find a word that means the opposite of smallest and the same 2 s biggest. 7. Which of these is the right meaning for ’’trunk" as it is used in the story? a. part of a tree b. a big suitcase c. swimming shorts d. elephant's nose 47B TEACHER KEY 1. white (accept where) 2. stood, stuck 3. putting, carrying, sleeping, eating (accept any two) 4. into 5. fluffy 6. played, walked, waddled, tried (accept any two) 7. truck, tried (accept either word) 8. shoe 9 . brand 10. untie 11. tools 12. geese 13. playful 14. see 46B TEACHER KEY 1. twigs, leaves, weeds 2. trunk 3. cloudy, down 4. walk 5. to, too 6. largest 7. d. elephant's nose 49 I. WORD RECOGNITION 50 WORD RECOGNITION D1 . Has sight word vocabulary of 170-to-240 words. TO THE TEACHER: Assessment ol the size ol a sight vocabulary must necessarily be tied to the particular materials that have been and are being used lor reading instruction. Specific words must f therefore, be selected from materials used. The Doleh list of 220 words is provided because it includes many uselul words that are frequently encountered. It should be understood, however, that (a) the list must be augmented with words from materials used and (1)) known words may appear on any or all of the sublists. In testing sight vocabulary, the emphasis should be upon quick recognition. A good procedure is to put individual words on flash cards and to present each word for a maximum of five seconds. (Alter sight recognition has been established vou may want to allow more time to determine whether’ the pupil can use other word recognition techniques to get the word.) You can note the method of attack to determine what skills are used, it any, and whether there is a tendency to over- analyze the words. You may use the word list on page 13 as a reference when making your flash cards. D2a. Three- letter consonant blends. TEACHER: Tell me the three letters that begin each word that I say. (Teacher reads - child does not see words.) Some of the words are nonsense words. scream thrund strible spr illy spread split scrof t strawberry three splack shrab shrimp Alternative word lists mav be used. Some suggested lists are the Botol word list oi- the Sullivan word list. An additional suggestion would be to develop a word list using the vocabulary of the basal reader you use. 51 52 I. WORD RECOGNITION I. WORD RECOGNITION D2b. Simple principles ol silent letters TO THE TEACHER: Have the child read these words. TEACHER: Some consonants are not heard in words, and arc called silent consonants. Tell me the consonants that are silent in each of these words. know sign thumb high witch knit wrong c 1 imb TEACHER: Some vowels are not heard in words. Tell me the vowels that are silent in each of these words. ea L gate sa il please read four D3. Has structural skills a) Syllabication TEACHER : Read these words and tell me how many parts you hear in each word. TO THE TEACHER: Give explanation if necessary. drum window basket finished number dictionary hat freeze letter foolish elephant decided sled visit Indian sent TO THE TEACHER: This would be a good place to develop the generalization that every vowel sound in a word means a syllable . 36 o 57 1 I. WORD RECOGNITION 1 58 I. WORD RECOGNITION E2. Knows Syllabication principles 1 E2b. Single vowel sound per syllable. a) Syllabication patterns 1 TO THE TEACHER: Write the words on a chalkboard or separate sheet of paper. TO TEE TEACHER: Write the words ou a chalkboard or 1 separate sheet. 1 TEACHER: Tell me where you would divide these words. I TEACHER: Each syllable has only one vowel sound, so the number of vowel sounds you hear tells you how many syllables are in the word. Head these wOrds. Where would you divide each of these words? limit I trial create produce 1 purple area visit I graduate audience little j cruel diameter lion variety silence violet radio widow 1 diet violin 1 idea poetry swimming I Indian fuel metal frozen J radiator museum custom 59 I, WORD RECOGNITION* 59B TEACHER KEY SUMMARY CARD — LEVEL E j The otter likes to slide down the bank of a stream. 1 In the winter he climbs to the top of a slope then I slides into the cold, icy water. The water splashes j and sprays much more when he slides this far. Not far 1 from the otter's slide lives an old turtle. During winter he lies buried under several layers of warm mud. 1 When spring comes he slowly climbs onto a rock to sun 1 himself. , . . , . 1 Some people say that a witch lives in the old rickety I shack near the otter's home. At night strange cries j have been heard when the wind whistles through the trees. 1 Once some boys knocked on the door of the old shack. 1 When they peeked in the window they saw an old woman 1 sitting in a rocking chair knitting a scarf. 1. stream, strange 2. climbs 3. otter's home 4 . splashes 5. witch, whistles, through, knocked, knitting 6. sprays, spring 1. Find two words in the story that begin with str. 2. What word contains a silent b? 3. What is the short way of saying the home of the otter that is used in the second paragraph? 4. Find one word that begins with the letters s£l. 5. Find five words in the second paragraph which have silent consonants. 6. Find two words in the story that begin with sgr . GPO 609—464—0 38 o X. WORD RECOGNITION* 60 SUMMARY CARD — LEVEL E Lions The lion is one of the strongest and fiercest of all animals. The male lion, with his heavy body, big head, and long mane looks like a king. Baby lions, called cubs, look like soft, furry kittens. When they are babies, lion cubs are as gentle and playful as kittens. When they are about six months old, they go hunting with their parents and outgrow their baby ways. Soon, they learn the ways of the grownup lion world. Lions hunt in groups called prides. The adult lions eat what they want of the food they catch. Then the younger lions eat what remains. Because of this, the young lions are sometimes weak and thin. They just don t get enough to eat. Lions hunt for food in the same way that a barn cat does. The lion hides and springs at smaller animals the same way a cat springs at a mouse. The lion's speed, strength, fierceness, ana cruelty make lion hunting a dangerous sport. 6 OB TEACHER KEY 1 . dangerous 2. fierceness — first syllable is accented 3. a. strong'est b. re mains' c. cru'el ty 4 . b. hunting group 5. c. what is left 6. kittens, playful, about, parents (accept any of these) 1. Find a three syllable word that means full of danger » 2. Find a two syllable word that means wildness. Which syllable of the word should be accenTetT? 3. Divide these words from the story into syllables. Put in the accent marks. a. strongest b. remains c. cruelty 4 . Which of these is the correct meaning of pride , as used in the selection? a. high opinion of one's self b. hunting group c. something one is proud of 5. Which of these is the correct meaning of remains, as used in the story? a, stays b. continues c. what is left d. k&eps on 6. Find two words in the second paragraph that hkve the scnwa sound . 39 1 2 II. COMPREHENSION II. COMPREHENSION Al. Develops listening skills. a. Has attention and concentration span suitable for his age. b. Is able to remember details. c. Can relate details to each other in reconstructing story read to him* d. Can follow two oral directions* (See card III. Al.) TO THE TEACHER: Observe the child’s listening in varied situations over a span of several months. There may be a variance between a child’s ability to repeat wnat he has heard and to act °n it. Though a child may have listened carefully and be able to repeat directions word for word, he may not retain the information to the completion of the task assigned. A2. Increases vocabulary through listening# TO THE TEACHER: Note the child’s incorporation of the listed school-type words into his listening vocabulary. Observe the child’s speaking vocabulary to determine if words from his listening vocabulary or concepts from it are fi-ltering into his speech. Listening Speaking lavatory wraps (coats) chalkboard custodian recess princ ipal Watch for the appearance in the child’s speech of other new words introduced in daily activities. NOTE TO TEACHER: You may wish to substitute words commonly used in your school for those on the above list. II. COr '-REHENS ION A3. Is able to recall stories in sequential order. TO THE TEACHER; Evaluate this skill u si ^ r »^ory with strong -mphasis on sequence, such as GfiliiilQfiKa and the Vn, ^ 3ears or Little. Rea Riding Heal* f Check to see mat the cnild can retell at least four events in proper sequence. II. COMPREHENSION A4. Anticipates outcome of stories# TO THE TEACHER; Read either of these stories to the child and have him predict the outcome. It was a rainy day. Puff, the kitten, had been outside playing in the mud. She was tired when she came in and wanted a soft, warm place to sleep. She was wet and her paws were muddy . Puff walked across the kitchen floor Mother had just washed. QUESTIONS: 1. Where did Puff go? 2. How did Mother feel about this? Father- and Bobby were raking the leaves. They saw a bird that could not fly. The bird had hurt its leg. Father did what he could for the bird’s leg. Then he put the bird into a small cage. Bobby gave the bird food and water every day. One morning Father said to the bird, ’’Now you are strong. We will miss you.” QUESTIONS: 1. What will the bird do? 2. How will Bobby feel about this? 40 II. COMPREHENSION A5. Interprets pictures critically. TEACHER: Look at these pictures and tell me about them. HOTE: Accept any reasonable answer that shows critical interpretation. II, COMPREHENSION Bl, Uses picture and context clues* To THE TEACHER: Picture ciuea: refer t0 Study Skllls card III. A4. for pictuies. Context clues: / e ®^ d t hlTappropri^ the child to n r | P 5roVided for the last two e »ch one^ No choices are^o^^ word the chlld supplies® to compSete Lch sentence. 1. Mary drew a funny picture of a dog. The children when they saw it . a. jumped b. laughed c. strut 2 . would you to the store and get a loaf of bread? a. catch b. smile c. go 3. Tom wanted a drink. Mother put some milk into a for him, a. glass b, basket c, walk 4. Helen had a cake with candles on it because it was her « — * 5. Joey was afraid he was late so he looked at the to see what time it was. II. COMPREHENSION A6. Can identify main characters in a story. SoSI ksk him what happened to the people. (Suggested procedure: Discuss story you are currently reading to the class.) b. Sentences c. Whole selections Uses punctuation as a guide to meaning. TO THE TEACHER: Have the c h jld read silently one of the two selections that follow. Next have the child r f ad f p h ? liability 0 to°deal*wi?I» Si&Ar&HKS SSiSMS ■»*"«• Read the dueetidns that SO “itn ^.J^jX/Vrefer ffifio '-saw “* nit ion . II. COMPREHENSION B2. and B3. (continued) want to 1 You do what you want, Fathe^. I will meet you at the car. Mr. Brown said. "I will come with you I want to see the hats, too. „ We will find a new hat for yai . "Good:" said Mrs. Brown. "We will go to this store. Maybe we will see a hat we like. went into the stoj*e. nais, hats, and hats! 1 said Mr. Brown "See what you can find, Mother. I'll look, too. "Look!" said Mr. Brown. "Here is a red hat. See how it looks on you. "I like this hat," said Mrs. Brown. "Can we get this hat in blue or black? Red is not a M good color for a hat for a grandmother . » "Red is a good color for you, You look good in this r^d hat f, I will get it for you: QUESTIONS: 1. Find three color words in the story. 2. Vhat color hat did Mr. Brown like? 3. What color hat did Mrs. Brown want to buy? 4 . Why do you suppose Mrs. Brown said that red 10 II. COMPREHENSION B2. and B3. (continued) Mr. White and Bob went to the circus. Thev went into a big tent and found their seats. They sat down and waited for the circus to begin Some elephants came into the tent A girl was riding on an elephant. Bob asked, lf May I Mr. White laughed and said, "No, Bob. You are not in the circus. _ . .. You can look at the animals, not ride them Then some lions in a cage came into the tent The lions looked at Bob* Bob looked away. *No lions for me, he said. "Look, Bob!" said Mr. White. "Here comes something you like Bob looked and saw a funny clown and a dog The clown had a red nose. The dog was a clown, too. He was in a yellow car. The dog had on a green hat. Bob laughed and laughed at the clowns. The clown saw Bob laughing. He walked over to Bob. . ... - "Do you want to come and have fun with me? ob looked at Mr. W^ite. ay I go with him? asked Bob. "Yes!" answered Mr. White. "I will watch you from here. You will be in the circus, after all QUESTIONS: 1. Find three color words in the story. What animals came into the tent first? How do you know Bob did not like the lions? Why couldn't Bob ride on an elephant? 2 . 3. 4 . 5. TEACHER KEY: 1. Accept any three: a. brown b. red c . blue d. black Child's answer should reflect the idea that red is a bright color and a grandmother may want something more subdued. 5. The clown took him into the ring and Bob was in the circus, after all. happy, excited, thrilled (accept any of the three or something similar) Whit surprising thing happened to Bob at the circus? How do you think Bob felt about the surprise? 42 11 12 II. COMPREHENSION II. COMPREHENSION Cl. Is able to gain meaning from... a. Words b. Phrases c. Paragraphs C2. Reads in meaningful phrases. TO THE TEACHER: Have the child read silently one of the two selections that follow. Next, have the child read the same selection orally and while he reads evaluate his ability to phrase. Watch for logical groupings, i.e., a noun and its modifiers; a verb and its helping verbs; prepositional phrases; as well as observation of punctuation and smooth overall effect. Read the questions that go with the story to the child. (See following cards.) Permit the child to refer back to the' story to formulate his answers. 12B TEACHER KEY : 1. She had no one to talk to at home. 2. "That green and yellow bird can talk." 3. Pretty Boy would not talk. 4 . "I like you! I like you! I like you!" 5. No. "Now n I will have someone to talk to at my house l " Cl. and C2. (continued) Miss Black went to the pet store. „ I do not have anyone to talk to at home, she said. I would like t$ have a bird that talks. Do you have a bird like that? she asked the storeman. "I sure do.*" said the man. "That green and yellow bird can talk. He can say his name. Come with me and I will have him talk for you. Miss Black and the storeman went over to the bifd. The man said, Pretty boy! Pretty Boy! Pretty Boy! The bird just looked and looked. He looked at Miss Black. He looked at the storeman. &it he would not talk. "Oh my! Oh. my!" said Miss Black. I want a bi£d that can talk. A talking bird would be fun to have. Miss Black was sad. She began to go. She said, "Good-by, Pretty Boy. I wish you would talk to me. M I like you and would like to take you home with me. Pretty Boy looked at Miss Black again. He bfean to talk! But he did not say his name. He said, I 1 ike you ! I 1 ike you ! I 1 ike you ! Miss Black clapped her hands and laughed. "Oh, good! I will take you home with me. |f Now I will have someone to talk to at my house! QUESTIONS : 1. Why did Miss Black want a talking bird? 2. Read the sentence that tells what Pretty Boy looked like. 3. Why were Miss Black and the storeman sad at first? 4. Read what Pretty Boy said. 5. Will Miss Black still be lonely? Read the sentence that answers the question. 13 II. COMPREHENSION Cl. and C2. (continued) Little Bear was an Indian boy. He watched the sheep in a field far from his tepee. This was a big job for one little Indian boy. His father Chief Rain Cloud knew that Little Bear must learn to be on his own. Then some day he would be a good chief. Every day Little Bear walked past a field of ponies on his way to the field where the sheep were. Every night he J dreamed about having a pony of his very own. Chief Rain Cloud told his son that wool from the sheep would be used to make blankets. When many blankets were sold there would be money to buy a pony. So Little Bear did not mind taking care of the sheep. Every day his mother made blankets. Chief Rain Cloud sold many blankets. Little Bear was very happy when there was enough money to buy a pony. He found a white pony that he liked best. This was the one he bought. QUESTIONS: 1. What was Little Bear’s job? 2. Why did he not mind working? 3. What was the father’s name? 4. What did Little Bear dream about at night? 5. How did Little Bear's mother help him get a pony? 6. What would be a good name for Little Bear ’s pony? 7. Why did Chief Rain Cloud want his son to work? 43 II. COMPREHENSION 13B TEACHER KEY: 1. He watched the sheep every day. 2. He would be able to earn money for a pony. 3. Chief Rain Cloud 4. He dreamed about having a pony of his very own. 5. She made blankets from the wool to sell. 6. White Cloud. White Star (Accept any reasonable answer.) 7. So he would learn to be on his own and could some day make a good chief. 14 Cl. and C2. (continued) Starfish are not really fish at all. They are animals that live in the sea. A starfish looks like a star. Most starfish have five arms. Some even have more! At the tip of each arm, the starfish has an eye. So they have as many eyes as they have arms. This animal is not like other animals. If the starfish loses an arm it can Brow a new one. If the starfish is cut in half, each piece Brows into a whole new starfish. A starfish is not Bood to eat. Dry starfish are very pretty. Some children look for dry starfish when they go to the sea. The children like to take them home. QUESTIONS : 1. How* many arms do starfish usually have? 2. Tell three unusual things about starlish. 3. Where do starfish live? 4. Is the starfish a fish? Read the sentence that answers the question. 5. Why do children look for starfish? 6. Why is this animal called a starfish? 7. What can the starlish do that people wish thev could do? 14B 15 II. COMPREHENSION TEACHER KEY: five Accept any three of the following: a . b. c . d. e . They look like stars. They are not really fish. They have so many arms. They have as many eyes as they nave arms. If cut in half, each piece grows into a ne starfish. If it loses an arm, it can grow a new one. 3. 4. 5. f the sea No. "Starfish are not really fish at all They are pretty. Children collect them. 6. It looks like a star. 7. Grow new parts — Child’s answer should reflect the idea of regeneration. D1 . Reads for facts D2. Reads for sequence of events. TO THE TEACHER: Have the child read the following selections silently. Then have him read them orally so that you can supply unknown words which might be necessary to understanding. Read the questions that g o with the selections. Permit the child to refer ack to the select ionsto formulate his answers. Use each of the following selections in this manner. Selections 1, 2 and 3 emphasize the individual skill evaluation, and selections 4 and 5 emphasize the incorporation of these in one exercise. 9 16 II. COMPREHENSION 17 II. COMPREHENSION* Dl. and D2. (continued) Selection 4. Ginn and Company Your Town and Mine . p. 73 From "Wool for Our Clothes. Dl. and D2. (continued) Selection 4. Ginn and Company Your Town and Mine , p. 73. Adapted from "Wool for Our Clothes. When the bags of wool reach the woolen mills, each fleece is pulled into pieces. The pieces are placed in piles. The best wool goes into one pile the next best into another. The wool that is not so good goes into still another pile. No dark wool is mixed with the white wool. The piles of wool must be washed in warm water. The wool comes our clean and white, but then it must be combed. Today big carding machines comb out the wool quickly . (cont lnued) QUESTIONS : 1. Name in order three things that are done to wool when it is brought to the factory. 2. What is another name for a woolen factory? 3. Select a title for the selection. A. How Wool is Washed. B. A Woolen Mill. C. Big Machines Today. 4 . Tell what kind of wool goes into each pile. 5. What kind of water is used for washing the wool” 6. Why must the wool be combed? CopyrUht 0 l%n, of lliv pub I IhIiits i r* i nn h tatmpdm', Krprtntfd willi r» 18 II. COMPREHENSION 17B TEACHER KEY: 1. a. pulled into pieces b. sorted into piles c . washed d. combed (Accept any three of the above four if they are in the proper order.) 2, a mill 3, A Woolen Mill 4, a. good b. next best c, not so good 5, warm 6, It is the sheep’s hair and could get tanl^d like people’s hair* To make it straight (so it can be made into cloth)- To make it easier to separate, NOTE: Since question 6 is inferential, accept any reasonable answer. Dl. and D2. (continued) Selection 2. Laidlaw Science Series Science , 3, pp. 24-25 "Meteors and Meteciites." Have you ever seen a bright flash or streak fn the sky? It seldom lasts more than a second. Some nights the sky seems filled with these flashes. Many people describe the flashes as "shooting stars." Actually, these flashes are made by small bits of matter that enter the earth's atmosphere. These traveling particles are called meteors. Most Topical headings 2) Cross references 3) Bibliographies g) Uses the index volume efficiently. TO THE TEACHER: Observations regarding efficient uae of encyclopedias are most appropriately made by teacher* responsible for science and social studies instruction ana by the IMC director or librarian. The skills listed above are most appropriately deaoastrated in regular work sessions. Informal observations should be sufficient; informal tests can be devised as needed. The following assessment cards may be used to supplement the informal tests devised. Where deficiencies are noted, there should be agreement among the science and social studies teachers and the IMC director or librarian as to who should be responsible for teaching each of the several skills. 33 III. STUDY SKILLS E2. Utilizes the encyclopedia, d) The index TO THE TEACHER: Have the pupil use the index below to answer questions. One of the best places to look for information is an encyclopedia. Since more than one volume is needed for all of the information found in encyclopedias, only topics listed under one or two letters of the alphabet can be placed in one volume. Each volume is also numbered. Look at the set of encyclopedias pictured. See how quickly you can find the number of the volume in which each of these topices may be found , Below is an index from an encyclopedia. It tells what topics are discussed in the Space section of the encyclopedia. Use the index to answer the questions on the right. Tell the topic, volume, and page number where you would expect to find information to answer the question. 1. birds - — 2. India 3. water — 4. Greek art _ 5. West Virginia 6. Lyndon Johnson 7. Oysters — 8. atomic power — m 9. Texas 10. King George III - SPACE Space satellites. S- 298-300 1 . How can a satellite serve as a space station? Space stations. S-300-301 2. What problems will men face in space travel? Space suit. S“ 104“ 105, picture S“104 3. What does a space suit look like? Space travel . S-301-309 development of. S-301-303 earth-moon distances. S-306 flight plan. S-307 future of. S-307-309 history of. S-295-297 problems of S-299-300 4. How is a space suit made? 5. 6. What did scientists know about space travel in 1946? Will trips to the moon or other planets be fairly common by 1986? 61 54 - III . STUDY SKILLS E3. Uses maps, charts and graphs. a) Gains skill in reading and interpreting political maps. b) Begins to read and interpret simple graphs. c) Reads and interprets several kinds of maps. d) Reads and uses captions, keys and legends of maps . e) Selects appropriate maps to determine 1) Direction 2) Distance 3) Land formation 4) Climates 5) Time zones 6) Populations f) Reads and interprets additional kinds of graphs. g) Answers questions requiring the interpretation of maps, graphs, tables. h) Gains skill in using many potential types of sources to solve a problem. TO THE TEACHER: These skills are most appropriately taught within the context of social studies instruction, with some support from the mathematics area. There should be a formal unit of study where the skills arc explicitly taught, and most observations regarding skill development can be made at that time. Specific observations to be made will be dic- tated, to a great extent, by the particular instructional materials used. The list should serve both in planning the skills unit and in assessing skill mastery systematically. 36 35 III. STUDY SKILLS E3. Uses maps, charts, and graphs * a) Maps TEACHER: Use this map to help you answer the questions below . 1. The United States is bordered on the north by ^ — , on the south b> . on the east by ^ — ^ — and on the west by — — 2. Dallas is about _ _ miles from Hew Orleans. 3. Chicago is about . miles from New York. 4. in which direction i$ Seattle from Los Angeles? 5. Point to the location of the city whore you live. 6. About how far is it from Charleston? 7. What direction is it from Dallas? 8. Is it closer to San Francisco or. Seattle? 37 III. STUDY SKILLS E3. Uses maps, charts, and graphs, b) Charts and tallies III. STUDY SKILLS E3. Uses *aps, charts, and graphs, c) Graphs TO THE TEACHER: Have the pupil read the paragraph and study the table below. Then have him answer the questions. The pupil may refer to the table for answers. TEACHER; Read the paragraphs and study the graphs below to help you answer the questions. SIXTH GRADE ATTENDANCE AT JEFFERSON SCH< Number Absent March April May June DOL Total Room 201 10 9 8 4 31 Room 202 9 10 6 5 30 Room 203 12 9 10 3 34 Room 204 8 10 8 0 26 Total 39 38 32 12 121 1. Susan spent $8.00 last month. She made this circle graph to show how she speat the money. About how much money did Susan spend for a) lunches? b) movies? c) savings? d) other expenses? The sixth grade classrooms at Jefferson School had a contest to see which room would have the best attend- ance, They kept a record of absences. At the end of the contest, tne table looked like the one above. ♦Remember, your total must be $8.00. (continued on next page.) 1, Which room had the fewest absences? 2, During which month were there the fewest absences? 3, During which month wore there the most absences? 4, What was the total number of absences during the four months? 5, How many pupils in Room ?03 wore absent in April? 62 3d III. STUDY SKILLS E3. Use« maps, charts, and graphs# c) Graphs (continued) 2. John made this line graph to show how spelled correctly on each spelling test, words on each test. spelling progress man; The] j wore re wei Is he -e 20 Week o Week 7 Week 6 Week 5 Week 4 Week 3 Week 2 Week 1 0 2 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 2< No. of words spelled correctly 1. Did John improve his spelling? How do you know? 2. How many words did he Spell correctly on the first test? 3. How many words did he misspell on the fourth test? A. When did he have a perfect paper? 5. Qa which test did John misspell She most words? 40 III. STUDY SKILLS E4. Uses IMC or library effectively, a) Understands fiction books are alphabetised by author . b) Begins to use card catalog to find information . c) Understands and uses author, title and subject cards, d) Locates books on shelves, e) Uses cross reference cards. f) Uses other reference materials: 1) Atlases 2) World Almanac a ) Magazines* and subject index to children’s magazines g) Locates and uses audio-visual materials: 1) Card catalog 2) Equipment TO THE TEACHER: Observations regarding use of the IMC will be made by the IMC director or librarian. designed for use in a specific IMC set ring anu w devised by the IMC director. In other settings the iko director or librarian should devise a checklist that be useful to her. 39 S3. III. STUDY SKILLS Uses maps, charts, and graphs Graphs TO THE TEACH HI: Have the pupil study the two bar graphs below and answer the questions. He may refer to the graphs for answers. HEIGHT^ 07 SOKE DAMS IH THE UNITED StATES The two graphs above are called bar graphs. Study them to help you answer the.pe questions. l whv is the' graph on the right called a vertical bar * graph? The graph on the left a horizontal bar graph? 2. Which dam is highest? 3. Which dam is lowest? 4. How high is Shasta Dam? 5. About how much higher is Hoover Dam than Grand Coulee Dam? 41 III. STUDY SKILLS X4. Supplement IMC SKILLS CHECKLIST Name I can check out and return books properly. I can use a bookmark to indicate the place. I can use the book supports on the shelves. I turn pages by the upper right hand corner. I know the parts of a book: cover table of contents bibliography index body title page I know the Dewey Decimal System of Classification. l know the ten general classifications. I can locate non-fiction books numerically and place them in the proper order. I understand that books are arranged numerically from left-to-right on the shelves. I can locate fiction books numerically by the * author. _ I can use the card catalog. I understand that all cards are arranged alphabetically. I, know and uso the three basic types of cards. I know and use 11 See” and 11 See also 11 cards. 63 42 III. STUDY SKILLS 45 III. STUDY SKILLS E4. Supplement (cont'd.) ___ I know how to use encyclopedias. I use guide letters to find information on a given subject. I use alphabetical arrangement to find information. I understand and use tbe index, I understand and use topical headings. I understand and dse cross references. I understand and use bibliographies. I understand tbe importance of a copyright date , I can use special reference aids. I know how to use atlases. ___ I know bow to use tbe World Almanac . _ I know how to use tbe Index to Children’s Poetry . — — — ■ - - I know how to use Bartlett's Familiar Quotations , ‘ I know how to use Webster’s Biographical Dictionary . I know bow to use magazines. I know how to use the subject index to children's magazines. I know bow to use tbe vertical file. I can use the card file to locate audio- visual materials. E4. Supplement (cont'd.) am able to operate audio tape recorder filmstrip projector opaque projector film projector visual equipment: record player filmstrip viewer overhead projector __ listening stations - — I have developed respect for materials and equipment in the IMC. I have developed respect for the rights r,nd needs of others. I am faailiar with tbe kinds of audio-visual material available. 44 III. STUDY SKILLS 45 III. STUDY SKILLS E5. Recognizes and uses with facility the various parts of texts and supplementary books and materials. TO THE TEACHER: The focus here should be upon pupil's Practical use. of their skills at locating information. Application of these skills is most easily observed as pupils prepare researched reports. Therefore, at least once each semester a research-type report should be assigned and each child's approach to the task observed for demonstrations of ability to use texts and supple- mentary books and materials efficiently. E6. Organizes information, a) Gains skill in nototakingr 1) Begins to take notes in own words. 2) Learns to take notes selectively* 3) Arranges ideas in sequence. 4) Selects main ideas. 5) Selects supporting details. 6) Keeps notes brief. 7) Shows ability to work from own notes. 8) Identifies source of materials by use of: a) Bibliography b) Footnotes TO TOE TEACHER: As a result of continuous observation, the teacher should be satisfied that the child can take notes that arc useful to him. Idiosyncratic approaches should be tolerated: that is, there should be no insist- ence upon a particular form or sequence of notetaking. Outlining, underlining in personal books and brief sum- maries are aH acceptable. Stress should be placed upon restatement of important points in the pupil's own lan- guage. The two cards which follow this one say be help- ful in assessing some notetaking skills. The test of success in notetaking is whether or not the pupil is able to use his own notes for the purpose for which they were intended: evaluation, then, Must be In terms of specific purpose. The checklist can serve as a guide to systematic observation; but. again, the stress should be on point seven: Shows ability to work fro* own notes , / o 64 4b 47 III. STUDY SKILLS III. STUDY SKILLS 16a. Gains skill in not staking# E6a. Gains skill in notetaking. TEACHVI: lead tbo four numbered sentences. Choose the phrase that best explains vbat each sentence is about. TO THE TEACHER: Have the child read the paragraphs below silently and take brief notes on the material. 1. Tfce shelter belt is a line of trees or shrubs which havs been planted to protect the soil of a region froe •rind and erosion. Simple Plants a) What is the shelter belt? h) Shelter belt prevents soil erosion, c) Trees or shrubs protect the soil. All plants are classified into several large groups. Plants made of on ly one cell or like cells form the simplest group. The plots in this group are called thallophytes. These plants do not have true roots, stems, or leaves . 2. More than 200 operations for the asking of a single shoe are usually handled by eight departments in a shoe factory. a) Shoe factory needs eight departments, h) How to make a shoe. c) 200 operations, eight departments to make 1 shoe. 3. The flycatcher is the name of two families of birds which eaten flies and other insects in the air. a) Flycatchers catch flies. b) Insects caught in air by flycatcher birds. c) Flies and insects caught by birds. 4. When death comes by drowning, it is really death by suffocation. a) Suffocation causes drowning death, h) Death comes by suffocation, c) Drowning is one way to die. TO TUI TKACUK: Since the child is given a choice of phrases rather than having to write nis own, this card is appropriate at grade four. One group of thallophytes called algae (al'je) con- tain chlorophyll and make their own food. Algae live in water or in moist places on land. The green scum you nave seen floating on water is algae. In sonic areas algae is used as food. Other uses of algae are as sources ol fertilizer and iodine. r a - P 1 ® °i h f r groups of thallophytes called fungi (fun'jl) do not contain chlorophyll and get their food hy living on other plants and animals. Fungi can be found almost every- where. Some fungi are useful to man as a source of food or to help fight disease. Other fungi, such as rust, smut and blight, destroy food crops planted by farmers. f 48 49 III. STUDY SKILLS III. STUDY SKILLS Z6b. Understands and uses outlining In work# E6h. Understands and uses outlining# 1) Uses correct form of outline. 2) Con find main ideu> 3) Makes sample outline, 4) Outlines topics in more detail TO THE TEACHER: Have the pupil read the following selec- tion and fill in the outline found on the next card. He may refer to the selection to help him complete the outline. 5) Uses own outline for oral and written reports. 6) Uses outline to organize thinking in appropriate areas . TO THE TEACHER: At the Intermediate levels the child is broadening his ability to outline. He Is responsible for independent select Ion of the main idea and Important sup* porting details. His ability to outline should he judged ovor a period of time In suen classes as science ana social studies. One of the complicating factors in a child's ability in this area is the loose structure of much textbook material. Another complicating factor Is the variation from child to child In the need for supporting detail to make the out* line a personally useful tool rather than a formal end in Itself. In addition to form therefore, utility should be an important guideline In helping you to make your judgment about the child's skill. For many years, the people of China were the only ones who knew the secret of making silk. They were very secre- tive, hut the secret was finally discovered hy others. It was surprising for many to learn that the silk the Chinese made into cloth came from the body ox on insect, the silk- worm. Today silk is made in many countries. Silk making is far from easy. Silkworms are hard to raise. They do not like cold weather. They do not like noise. Only the leaves of the mulberry tree will satisfy their fussy appetites. A silkworm is fully grown when it is only four or fivs weeks old. At that time, it is ready to apin its cocoon. The cocoon is made as the worn spina a long silk thread around its body. This thread is all one piece. At the silk factory, cocoons are made Into cloth. The cocoons are placed into warm water to soften the fibers. Girls carefully unwind the long thin thread from each co- coon. The fibers from several cocoons, at least four, are twisted together to make a silk thread. This thread is then made into cloth. PROCEDURE: In addition to your Informal observations, described above, you should check periodically to see that the pupils know the structure of a formal outline. You may have the pupil outline material from a text- book: out be sure that the material is well-written mo as to lend itself to outlining. Or. you may ask the pupil to make an outline upon which he would base a talk or report. Or. you may use the following assessment cards. so III. STUDY SKILLS £! III. STUDY SKILLS E6b. Outlining ((Mint'd.) The article you .just read is easy to outline because there. is only one topic in each paragraph. First, think of a title for the article. Then, write the main topics of the paragraphs beside the Rowan nu- merals in the outline. There are details in each paragraph, too. Write at least two of them under each wain topic . (Title) A. B. E6c. Summarizes material, 1) Writes summary of a story in three or four sentences. SUGGESTED PROCEDURE: Have the pupils read a selection (several paragraphs) and write a summary ; in three to rift® sentences. The notetaking selection on Simple Plants, page 46, could be the material used. Check to see that the summary covers the main points and that the sequence or main organization is preserved. NOTE: The pupil should be able to summarize material in his own words. Obviously some* words and phrases from the selection are efficient aids in summarizing. These have* become ithe pupil's "own words if they have meaning for him and are, therefore, acceptable. C. II. A. B. C. D. 2) States important points expressed In n discussion. SUGGESTED PROCEDURE: Contrive a situation in which an issue important to the pupils is discussed. Have them write a summary of the Important points expressed. In each summary, look for the main issue, mnin points of view and objectivity. III. A. B. C. A. B. C. D. •Remember, you may only find two details in some paragraphs. sz HI. STUDY SKILLS E7. Evaluates information# a) Realizes printed statements may be either fact or opinion# TO THE TEACHER: Have the students read the following sentences and label them facts or opinions, Rich people never buy used cars. Lazy people are not interested in having money. Never believe a person who is a good storyteller, TV violence causes people to behave violently. Every letter has a postmark to show where it was mailed, A lame man may be a good swimmer. Scientists have found that Mars has seasons in which the color of its surface changes. The above sentence proves there is life on Mars. TV commercials always exaggerate. S3. III. STUDY SXILLS E7b. Checks statements with: those in other sources to evaluate validity. TO THE TEACHER*: Observe student's ability and initiative in checking other sources when a 'point is questioned in science or social studies. If informal situations do not occur, the teacher and librarian may find examples of con- flicting information in reference books and pose the prob- lem to a group, noting their ideas for further research. A suggestion would be to compare Southern news coverage and a Midwestern news account of a civil rights case or an attempt to integrate a Southern school. TO THE TEACHER: Observe the pupil's ability to differ- entiate between fact and opinion in class discussions, etc. 54 III. STOTT SKILLS S 7 o. Evaluates relevancy of materials to topic# tom TKACEXK: 1h« following is a type of axerciae which you sight uas to estlaate the child's ability to determine potentially relevant information. TEACHER: Which of thaae book* would JFgbably contain,, information relevant to the topic of "photoeyntheiii? a. Ancient Civilisations b. jjja World Book Encyclopedia . P c. 2 . 5 . Camara d. Tho Tlrat Beck of Planta a. Isa Sawyer f. a mclanca textbook TO m TEACHER: Beyond basic relavanca. the ■ubtlor element a of raletanca seem to be creative and interpretive reading Skills. These slgftt involve a child's ability to convince the reader or listener of a relationship which he may or may not hare perceived. S< 0 III. STUDY SKILLS I7c. Evaluates Information in terms of his own experience# TO THE TKACHES: This is a nebulous but important skill. Observations must be made opportun 1st ic ally as the PUPIIb show their ability and willingness to evaluate new Infor- mation in terms of both actual and vicarious experience. for example, pupils might die actual experiences with certain products to confirm or negate advertising claims: they might contrast their actual experiences in visiting an area with the lmpresslonc they had— from all sources*" before making the visit. You should be alert to use situations in which pupils can be encouraged idormalio^^Ons way to"make the basic" point is to^have several pupils^ witness a _*f| 8 ed_ incident askjthem^to a _ alert to use situations in which pupils cai to draw upon their personal experiences in its. drawing conclusions and evaluating new Ons way to make the basic point is to have ,1 pupiis witness a staged incident, ask the* to . up sye-wltness accounts independently, and then 1 st them compare the several accounts and note discrepancies. 5? III. STUDY SKILLS E7d. Compares various viewpoints on the some topic# SUGGESTED PROCEDURE: Ask the pupil (s) to gather points of view on an issue in the current local or national news v (from radio end television news reports, newspapers, etc.) Discuss possible reasons for differences of opinion and have each child examine tho basis for his own opinion on the leeue. Note his ability to examine objectively point* of view that differ from hie own and hie ability to modify hla views in the light of new facts. A suggestion would be to have tho accounts of an athletic event. For lldren examine two example, a Chicago ■porta column and a Madison sports column on Monday fol- lowing a* Packer a- Bear a football game. S7 III. STUDY SKILLS* E7f . Identifies propaganda# TEACHER: Specify tho type of propaganda device being used in the following statements. 1. Nine out of ten people Interviewed prefer Brand A to Brand B. 2. The candidate is a regular guy, an ordinary man who understands your problems. Too Drysdale ueee Gillette Blue Blades. The Beat lee recommand peace talks about flat Nam. 6 . The mayor la working to promote patriotism, honssty, justice, end good huaan relations by his platform. 6 . A number of experts ere convinced that safsty prob- lems are due to faulty autos&blla manufacture. TO THE TKACHKR: This Is a grade elx skill. 67 O ERIC 573 III. STUDY SKILLS TEACHER KEY: 1. bandwagon - Everyone is doing it. 2. Plain folks * The person they wish us to admire is P no different from the ordinary person. 3. te.stimonial - Endorsement by a celebrity » 4. transfer - To transfer our feelings from one thing to another. n, glittering generalities - An expression of ideas thac * most people like. 6. card stacking - Telling only part of the story. 5 & III. STUDY SKILLS E8. Follows directions. TEACHER: See how well you follow these directions. Directions Test Can you follow these directions? X. Read all of these directions before doing anything. 2. Write your name at the top of thiB page. 3. Make a circle around the words, "Direction Test" . 4. Draw three large BquaroB at the upper right hand corner of this page. 5. When you get to thiB point, Btand up and lcudly say your name. 8. Put a circle in each corner of this page. 7. Get up, quickly walk to the front of the room, crawl back to your seat. 8. Draw a triangle on the back of this page. 9. If you have followed the directions so far, say, "Yes, I have!" out loud. ID. Now that you have read everything, follow only the first three directions. GPO 609—4 64—2 68